Opponents of civil disobedience see it as a threat to democratic society and the forerunner of violence and anarchy. The premise... to disobey a law that they feel is unjust. As martin luther king Jr. , wrote in his Letter from Birmingham Jail, "I submit that an individual who breaks a law that his conscience tells him is unjust, and willingly accepts the penalty by staying in jail to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the very highest respect for law. " Civil disobedience is most justifiable when prior lawful attempts to rectify the situation have failed; and when the acts of civil disobedience are done to force the society to recognize the problem; when performed openly and publicly; and when the actor will accept the punishment. Many proponents urge that civil disobedience be used only in the most extreme cases, arguing that the Constitution provides many opportunities to voice one's grievances without breaking the law.
Chaos and savagery come as a result of men trying to find pleasure without making sacrifices. Order are situations in which humans are forced to suppress their instincts and follow rules to attain their goals. 4D. The subject ive chosen is sort of a broad idea that can be grasped by looking deeper into the idea. By looking at the fact that Golding is trying to explain that all humans are evil can tie into the Chaos on the island.
Friedrich Nietzsche’s “On the Genealogy of Morality” includes his theory on man’s development of “bad conscience.” Nietzsche believes that when transitioning from a free-roaming individual to a member of a community, man had to suppress his “will to power,” his natural “instinct of freedom”(59). The governing community threatened its members with punishment for violation of its laws, its “morality of customs,” thereby creating a uniform and predictable man (36). With fear of punishment curtailing his behavior, man was no longer allowed the freedom to indulge his every instinct. He turned his aggressive focus inward, became ashamed of his natural animal instincts, judged himself as inherently evil, and developed a bad conscience (46). Throughout the work, Nietzsche uses decidedly negative terms to describe “bad conscience,” calling it ugly (59), a sickness (60), or an illness (56); leading some to assume that he views “bad conscience” as a bad thing.
Raskolnikov wonders why so many crimes are committed so poorly. He concludes that criminals go through a failure of the will. He endeavors not to let anything prevent him from carrying out the crime in complete control of his reason and will, which is a huge sign that his psychological and intellectual mind are working together, instead of battling like most people’s. However, both reason, and will fail him during some parts of the murder. He does have the good sense to clean his axe and boots, but he leaves the door open as a sign that he isn’t thinking clearly.
The principal goal of a penitentiary was it to be a place to express regret for the wrongdoing one has done. They expected a criminal to reflect on what he or she has done and feel horrible for it. This allowed the criminals to say that he or she is sorry and to promise not to do it again. They also wanted a criminal to achieve the kind of spiritual transformation in a criminal being that was associated with the religious beins of the medieval monastery. Many of the early advocates of the penitentiary was very religious men.
Many of them are about being aware of the impact of decisions on one’s own feeling of protection. It can be considered to be self-serving and callous. Because the problem with this is that his theory is overwhelmingly cruel. Throuhgout the text, it can easily be observed that he supports the regime of violence so as to maintain power. For example, according to Machiavelli, it may be necessary to be violent towards disobedient people and Machiavelli(1532) says “The prince should make himself feared in a such way that, if he is not loved, at least
The philosopher Hegel stated people are punished not only to acknowledge them as human beings ,by punishing people, pain is inflicted for a wrong deed in much the same way that good behaviour is rewarded. Dating as far back as the 18th and 19th century punishment has always been seen as an act of inflicting pain upon offenders on account of a crime committed. Punishment during that ranged from public standing in the pillory, to branding, whipping and burning and in most cases death by hanging. This sort of public shame was done in an effort to deter the offender from committing any future crimes as well as sending out a message across society that crime was not tolerated. With the passage of time into modern society punishment is seen as having evolved.
I have concluded that substance abuse is a huge contributor to crimes being committed. The lack or decrease in moral intuition and character can cause a person to make bad decisions. This would cause people not to understand the benefits of to abiding to common social values. A person demographics can also play a role in determining whether or not an individual will turn to a life of crime. Government officials, politicians, and courts employees have concluded that individuals commit crimes for private alternatives and they should be punished and held responsible for their actions and conduct.
The second and the most important step is the punishment. Because if the criminal hasn’t been punished he wouldn’t realize that he is wrong and regret. Prison should be the worst place that human beings can live in. prison isn’t only for punishment. The prisoners have to be educated in order to get a job.
The sentence to be fair involves taking those things into account. But inevitably there is criticism. It is hard to get media coverage of the circumstances of the accused. The public does not want to know. The public is hard.” From that it can be seen that the public is bias towards the circumstances of the supposed victim and wants the accused punished without any regard to their situation.