Comparing Man’s Relationship to Animals

695 Words3 Pages
Terrance Davis English 383 Romanticism February 7, 2008 Dr. Feldman Comparing Man’s Relationship to Animals Both “The Mouse’s Petition” by Anna Letitia Barbauld and “The Cow and the Ass” by Ann and Jane Taylor explore mankind’s relationship to animals. They explore this relationship by speaking through the point of view of the animals. In both poems each protagonist talks about their relationship to man in an oppressive manner. In “The Mouse’s Petition” the mouse reveals a physical and psychological oppression in a persuasive tone whereas in “The Cow and the Ass”, the cow reveals its physical oppression in a more descriptive tone. The purpose of this paper is to explore man’s oppressive relationship to animals revealed in these two poems, in the different ways they are presented The mouse uses strong persuasion to get his views across to man. Obviously, the mouse is caught in a trap at night and is not dead. The mouse argues for compassion on the verge of impending death that comes with being discovered the next morning. He equates his relationship to man as equal by saying that if a man believed in freedom then he should not oppress a free-born mouse (Ln.9-12). From there the mouse further equates himself with man by calling himself a commoner and saying that he deserves common gifts from heaven such as cheerful light and vital air (Ln.21-24). This is psychological oppression for the mouse because he feels that he is equal to man under the heaven and he can’t get man to see this. In lines 25-28 he makes the point that man, as intelligent as he is should “cast round the world and equal eye, and feel for all that lives”. Again he argues his equality to man. Equality is his sole basis for pleading to be spared. Lastly, he makes a reference to reincarnation by saying, “a never dying flame, still shifts thro’ matter’s varying
Open Document