Compare the Ways in Which the Writers in Clown Punk and Give Convey Attitudes Towards Characters on the Edge of Society.

872 Words4 Pages
Both poems use their titles to convey attitudes towards marginalised characters. In the title “Clown Punk”, the writer juxtaposes two contrasting ideas. The punk image was of aggression and intimidation; most punks of the 1970s would not have taken kindly to being called something as ridiculous as a “clown”. Straight away the writer has suggested that the narrator of the poem finds the punk image to be laughable and not intimidating at all. Similarly, the title “Give” suggests an attitude. The word could be interpreted as an aggressive demand or a cry for help. In the poem the character is both hostile and pleading in a desperate attempt to get attention because of the way in which he feels he has been ignored by society. Although both poems feature characters shunned by society they are written from contrasting points of view. ‘The Clown Punk’ is written from the view point of a father who is driving “home” through the “shonky” part of town. He seems at ease in his car and his tone is dismissive as he says, “three times out of ten you’ll see the town clown”. Here, the fact that he sees the man regularly suggests it’s something he is used to and the phrase “town clown” suggests the finds it vaguely amusing – the rhyme seems to trivialise the punk. His dismissive tone continues in the ironic phrase, “don’t laugh”. Here, the enjambment draws attention to the words and helps reinforce the irony. This view point is in contrast to that of “Give”. In this poem the view point is that of the homeless character so we get to see the other side of the story. It is a dramatic monologue in the 1st person so the voice of the character is used to create his feelings and attitudes. For example, he begins by addressing the listener as “dear” in a heavily sarcastic tone we feel is bitter and angry. However, in ‘The Clown Punk’ we never hear the voice of the punk. The effect of
Open Document