There are many different constructions and theories on personality which all have their own strengths and weaknesses and all of which try to offer an explanation to the differences in people’s behaviour. This essay will look at Hans Eysenck’s Trait Theory (1965) which is interested in measuring people’s personality through traits. According to this perspective, traits are stable over time and differ between individuals. We will also look at George Kelly’s Personal Construct Theory (1955.) He believed that people develop constructs as internal ideas of reality to help them understand the world around them and that the way the world is viewed is based on individual experiences, interpretations and observations.
Biological and Humanistic Approaches to Personality Thesis The tenacity of this paper is to clarify and debate the amount to which development needs effects personality creation. Biological issues that sway the establishment of characters, which are themes of discussion along with the dissimilar features of humanistic philosophy, which are recognized to be mismatched with organic clarifications of character. The explanations will be a praise of Maslow’s grading philosophy. A large part of tutoring has an emphasis on understanding the growth of the human character. Corporeal, ethical, socio-emotional verbal and reasoning each of these issues makes up the creation of the individual character.
Personality Analysis: Allport and Maslow PSY/405 September 11, 2011 Abstract There are many theories associate with the development of personality such as Humanistic, Existential and Individual theories. Each theory attempts to address the components of what makes an individual’s personality the way it is and attempts to use this theory to understand or better predict behavior. In this paper we will examine the ideas of personality development through the views of Abraham Maslow and Gordon Allport. Both Maslow and Allport’s theories are considered to be Humanistic in their approach to personality theory as each is based in the idea that each individual has value, control, and is capable of personal growth. In this paper we will examine how each theory views personality development, characteristics, and traits.
Course: Psychology of Personality Draft paper on: "Comparative analysis of basic approaches to understanding human personality: Psychodynamic theories, Behavioral and Cognitive models, and Phenomenologcial perspective" Personality development has been a major topic of interest for some of the most prominent thinkers in psychology. Our personalities make us unique, but how does personality develop? How exactly do we become who we are today? In order to answer this question, many prominent theorists developed theories to describe various steps and stages that occur on the road of personality development. The following theories focus on various aspects of personality development, including cognitive, social and moral development.
This essay analyses differences in these approaches regarding SDO as an influential factor when predicting behaviours which can establish an individual’s position in a social hierarchy being context dependent as SIT claims or determined by an individual as SDT states. SDT was instigated by Sidanius and Pratto (1999) and inspired from SIT (Tajfel, 1978; Tajfel & Turner, 1986). The theory attempts to comprehend the foundation of forming and upholding group based social hierarchies. They claim hierarchically based societies are more essential for a sustainable continuation compared to democratic societies which are not as stable, group based hierarchies are able to maintain their stability by reinforcing several mechanisms in the form of prejudice, stereotypes and discrimination termed ‘legitimizing myths’, mainly through social policies exerted by high status groups. Similar to SIT, SDT states that low status groups or individuals attempt to progress their status, although SDT stresses the struggle of inequality between groups and dominance of higher status groups.
As a result there are a variety of theories of personality which try to describe the cause and effect of the human personality. This essay will briefly compare and contrast two of these theories which include the psychoanalytic and humanistic theories of personality. It is important to have an in-depth understanding of the various types of theories with respect to personality because such a discourse enables psychologists to discover more about social behaviours in daily life (Fiske et al, 2010; 365). Both theoretical viewpoints, while being substantially different from each other, do share some common comparisons as we shall examine below. Psychoanalytical theories of personality stress the individual’s unconscious motivations which can be identified through dreams, slips of the tongue and fantasies (McCrae & Costa, 2003; 21).
42.). Humans have an intrinsic desire to predict things; and to effectively interact with our world we must expect certain things to happen based upon the physical and social interactions we encounter. The construct of personality is the observed regularities in cognitive, affective and behavioural responses in various settings. Variation in a construct such as personality causes individual differences in response to real life experiences. In this essay, we look at whether the construct of personality is a realistic idea and whether personality traits truly exist as it is difficult to measure a theoretical concept accurately.
In analyzing as well as comparing the humanistic and biological approaches to personality one can result to difference in opinions. Abraham Maslow did study the development of personalities based on the human needs. His needs hierarchy portrays the influence of human needs to formations of peoples’ unique and individual personalities. There are some biological factors which does influence formation of one’s personality which usually plays a major role. Through reviewing the relationships that are there between Maslow’s theory and biological factors we will be in a position to see some focused similarities as well as its upcoming.
“Describe and evaluate Carl Jung’s theory concerning personality types and show how they might usefully help a therapist to determine therapeutic goals” Introduction In this essay I aim to demonstrate an understanding of Jung’s theory of personality types by looking at the characteristics of the attitudes and functions and how these can be related to psychological disturbance. I will be describing and evaluating his theory and how it might be useful in helping a therapist to determine therapeutic goals. I will then conclude my findings. Jung’s model is concerned with the movement of the psychic energy and the way in which an individual habitually or preferentially positions one’s self in the world. Used responsibly, it is a precious guide to our dominant psychological disposition, the way we mostly are.
One of these is trait theories. Different trait theories use different amounts of traits when measuring an individual’s personality. These traits are the characteristics of an individual’s personality, for example, when asked to describe somebody’s personality you may describe them has shy or aggressive, these are known as traits. One well known trait theorist is Hans Eysenck: Han Eysenck (1916-1997) was a British psychologist and the founding editor of the journal of Personality and Individual Differences (Education Forum, 2012). In his book The Structure of Human Personality, Eysenck defines personality as being ‘the more or less stable and enduring organization of a person’s character, temperament, intellect, and physique, which determines his unique adjustment to the environment’ (Eysenck, 1960, p.2).