Compare And Contrast Roosevelt And Woodrow Wilson

1024 Words5 Pages
Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson are two of America's most praised presidents throughout the twentieth century. These men hold a significant place in American history as perhaps the greatest leaders that had ever served our country. Theodore Roosevelt who was a Republican had a military foundation and made the American preservation development. Theodore Roosevelt was likewise once shot by a would be professional killer and still figured out how to give his discourse. Roosevelt was celebrated by his quote "It takes more than one to execute a moose." On the other had Woodrow Wilson who is a Democrat shaped the thought of save peace. The stories about these men are the stories that are taught in our schools today to our youngsters. These…show more content…
This development was concerned with essential social and monetary changes and picked up in ubiquity under two presidents. Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson embraced two separate methodologies to dynamic change. Furthermore every one could sway congress to pass enactment in keeping with his adaptation of the dynamic dream. These two individuals, despite the fact that they had distinctive standards as a main priority, had one objective: to roll out improvements to the country for the better of the individuals and the nation. Embarking to achieve this objective, Roosevelt came to be a president of the normal man while Wilson turned into the "better" dynamic president. Despite the fact that they were both progressives, the two presidents had distinctive ways as a primary concern for the fate of the United States. Their alternate point of view and necessities were apparent in their addresses: New Nationalism by Roosevelt and New Freedom by Wilson. Wilson's New Freedom looked to the demolition of all trusts to push budgetary rivalry and allow little organizations by and by to thrive. While the national government was to utilize its energy on a one-time premise to bust all trusts, the central government was to have no part in managing business. Any regulation would need to be carried out by state governments. This differentiated particularly with Roosevelt's New Nationalism, which called for a significantly stronger part for the president and the central government in directing the economy and checking the misuses of corporate force. New Freedom and New Nationalism contrasted fundamentally, then, in their perspectives of elected administrative force. Roosevelt needed to utilize it while Wilson did not. Roosevelt turned into the president of the normal man, picking up monstrous ubiquity and offer

More about Compare And Contrast Roosevelt And Woodrow Wilson

Open Document