Primogeniture was carried out in European and Japanese feudalism in order to centralize the lands of aristocracies, this emphasized the profit of lords and made sure that the property of a family won’t be separated and declined at last. In term of cultural features, Japanese feudalism was based on the ideas which borrowed from China, Confucius’s thoughts and ideas. Confucius was a great philosopher and he emphasized morality and respects for parents and other elders, and superiors. In Japan, warriors, which were called samurai, held a duty to protect the peasants and villagers in their region. And as in return, the duty of peasants and villagers were to honor the samurai and pay taxes to them.
There are time periods in the history of both Japan and Western Europe (namely England and France) in which feudalism was the system of government. It was the major political system of both cultures between the 11th and 13th centuries, involving a system of mutual obligations. Though they share the same name, there are a few major differences between the two versions, causing European feudalism to stand out as what most people likely think of feudalism today and Japanese feudalism to fall into the background. Although both systems of feudalism were based on mutual obligations and protection and influenced the social structures of their people, European feudalism was created to protect Europeans from outside invasions and was mainly economic while Japanese feudalism developed because of internal attacks by groups of uncontrolled armies and had more of a military aspect. European and Japanese feudalism were similar in the fact that they both developed out of a need for protection.
European Feudalism VS. Japanese Feudalism Even though European and Japan Feudalism have a lot of difference, but it also has a lot of similarities such as they both also have peasants emperor (king) and lords (it’s called knights in Europe). They both hire samurai (knight) to protect their owner and their lands. They owners of samurai and knights have the same expectation from them. Last, their level they are on stay with them forever they have no ways to move up. The differences are the samurai and knight dress differently.
Musui’s Story is a personal memoir of samurai Katsu Kokichi, whose life extended during the Tokugawa period in the early 1800s in Japan. This autobiography reflects upon the nature of the Tokugawa society, but most importantly the role that the samurai class held during this era. With repetitional civil wars threatening the population’s safety, the samurai social class arose from the demand of a warrior class that could successfully abstain the population from obvious dangers. In the Tokugawa period, individuals had strict codes and ethics to obey by in order to be considered samurais. These rigorous warriors had to firmly conform to their masters to directly demonstrated respect to those above them in the social class, and they had to follow the bushido code, which was a unique Japanese code of conduct that was created in the 1600s.
DBQ Essay Bryan Orozco 9-11-14 4th period There are plenty types of warriors but for now I’m only going to write about samurais and knights. They both are sworn to oaths to the lord to protect their city. Loyalty towards the feudal lord in Japan was hereditary. The samurai’s life didn’t belong to himself but to the lord. At all times must they follow the kings and lords commands and If not followed then there are greatly dishonored.
Anne Oakley argues that we still live in a patriarchal (male dominated) society, and therefore women occupy a subordinate and dependant role within the family and wider society. Overall it could therefore be argued that rather than partners becoming more equal, women now have to carry a ‘dual burden’, whereby she is responsible for two jobs of unpaid or paid labour. Factors such as patriarchy and conforming to a gender script will lead to these divisions. It could be argued that the money management within a family has an effect on the
In East Asia, women were subjected to a strong patriarchal authority. Through the use of foot binding (implemented when they were young) freedom was especially limited. Such as in present day Saudi Arabia women barely had any rights and were thought of as owned and a service to their husbands. Women in present day Saudi Arabia can’t go anywhere without a man and must wear a niqab or a burka to hide them from the affection of other men. Unlike Saudi Arabia today, East Asian women bind their feet to make them appeal more attractive to men.
Religion was everywhere in both countries and they were both monotheistic with the belief in only one god, simular also was that they both built places of worship for them in this case Europe build churches while the Japanese built temples. Although around the same time these two great nations had their differences of a vast amount. Soldiers were the backbone of both of the countries but the Japanese soldiers were a lot more disciplined and respectful the malevolent European knights. Women were both a part of the different medieval periods but had their Fair share of differences too, for instance in Japan women could hold positions of power a feat not done with European women, and women could become Samurai were as European women
They held the power and control. The seclusion of women was also a major contribution of both of these empires as women, usually the elite, were required to be veiled. Women were subordinate to their husbands and fathers, eventually losing power over time. Nonetheless, women were allowed to manage trade and money-lending. Politically speaking, the Ottoman and Safavid empires differed in how they maintained power over their kingdoms.
In terms of practical comparisons, both models incorporated the need for resource and labour extraction, yet the Japanese model featured capital and human investments for mutual economic gain, whereas the Euro-American model was a relatively one-sided exchange of commodities for the sole benefit of the metropole, and the Japanese model was predicated on the assimilation of Japanese cultural norms in colonial environments, whereas the Euro-American model tended to avoid direct infringement on local tribal customs so long as military and political authority went unchallenged. There were some outward similarities in the Euro-American and Japanese empires; both developed hierarchical models of ethnicity, for instance. The colonizers generally believed that the world was composed of competing peoples, some more adept at pursuing economic wealth, military success, organizational stability,