Immanuel Kant and Aristotle
This paper requires us to first describe the ethical theories of both Aristotle and Immanuel Kant. Before analyzing, first question one may ask is who are they and why are their theories so important. Firstly, Aristotle was born in Greece and was revered as a great philosopher. His writings, till this date, are very important and thought-provoking. His work primarily consisted of poetry, theater, music, politics, logic, physics and etc. He can be called the founding figure of the development of philosophy in the Western World. Meanwhile, Kant was born in Germany and is also called an important philosopher. His work can be called along the lines of Aristotle. Aristotle and Immanuel Kant work can be called similar because there broaching of the topic of ethics is kind of similar and based primarily on rationality and the law of reason. Their theories are basically built on the secular approach. They also refer to both divine revelations as well as factual scripts in research of their work and therefore cannot be classified under the Natural Jurists. The major difference of both the philosophers was in the authority of ethics. This is what we shall elaborate on more and also provide other contrasting opinions.
It cannot be said with more assertiveness that both these philosophers were adamant about their findings and did not budge or get influenced by other philosophers. They believed what they wanted and strongly provided reasoning for it. Aristotle belief was primarily based in the historical justifications, whereas, Kant provided modern reasoning for the entire purpose of ethics; human good. In my opinion, maybe belonging from Generation X, I believe that Kant's theory was far more comprehensible in these times because he described the concept of Good in a very universal tone and provided the categories of man's priorities or what can be classified as his imperatives. Aristotle,...