Compare and Contrast Herbert Hoover’s Economic Policies with Those of Franklin Roosevelt

1173 Words5 Pages
Compare and contrast Herbert Hoover’s economic policies with those of Franklin Roosevelt. At the time of the stock market crash, nobody could foresee how long the downward slide would last. President Hoover was wrong, but not alone in thinking that prosperity would soon return. President Hoover believed the nation could get through the difficult times if the people took his advice about exercising voluntary action and restraint. Hoover urged businesses not to cut wages, unions not to strike and private charities to increase their efforts for the needy and jobless. Until the summer of 1930, he hesitated to ask Congress for legislative action on the economy, afraid that government assistance to individuals would destroy their self reliance. Franklin Roosevelt decided to take a dramatically different approach. In his campaign for president in 1932, Roosevelt offered promises to improve the economy. In his acceptance speech at the Democratic convention in 1932, Roosevelt had said “I pledge your, I pledge myself, to a new deal for the American people.” During the early years of his presidency, it became clear that his new deal programs were to serve three R’s: relief for people of our work, recovery for business and the economy as a whole, and reform of American economic institutions. In June 1930, President Hoover signed into law a schedule of tariff rates that was the highest in history. The Hawley Smoot Tariff passed by the Republican Congress set tax increases ranging from 31 percent to 49 percent on foreign imports. Its political proposes was to satisfy U.S. business leaders who thought a higher tariff would protect their markets from foreign competition. In retaliation for the U.S. tariff, however, European countries enacted higher tariffs of their own against U.S. goods. The effect was to reduce trade for all nations, meaning that both the national and
Open Document