Glenn mainly cares about how many followers he can obtain while he himself indoctrinates them to hate Obama because on almost every episode of his show he does not fail at portraying Obama as a deceiving, untrustworthy, and horrible president. Glenn chooses words that usually have a negative connotation when talking about President Obama or the government most of the time. Glenn used the word indoctrination and children to scare parents to think their children were having a democratic agenda being pushed on them but that is not necessarily the case. Glenn Beck’s main goal is to make people hate and dislike Obama and the democratic party whether he uses facts or
Can he achieve all of the promises made to the people? Many advisers of the White House have hope, comparing Obama to Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton, because both of the presidents had even lower ratings but ended up coming back strong and tactful. Obama is mainly focused on the debts and the deficits of, by attracting private investment. If by 2012 President Obama does not step up the game, many of his voters will disappear. When the people were asked if they would rather have “new government investments" or "cutting taxes for business" as the better approach to jump-start job creation, 38% were in favor of the tax cuts and one-third of them being Obama’s voters.
In the closing weeks of this campaign, Governor Romney has started calling himself an agent of change. And I'll give him one thing -- offering another $5 trillion tax cut weighted towards the wealthy, $2 trillion in defense spending our military didn't ask for, and more power for big banks and insurance companies is change, all right. But it's not the change we
Zinoviev was seen by the party as ‘the most despicable individual since Mussolini.’ He was considered vain and arrogant with very limited political success, so he was unable to challenge Stalin’s authority alone. Kamenev was viewed as an unambitious person and never made an effort to become leader of the Soviet Union, this really limited his chances of becoming leader. Bukharin was seen as an able competitor, honest and incorruptible. However his appeal was damaged by his open disagreements with Lenin, also he did not openly go against Stalin which led him to be manipulated by Stalin. Overall Stalin
In 1985, this was unheard of, and if a man were to watch such a show, he would surely have been ostracized. As far as 1985 is concerned, men did not like pink unicorns. Men did not feel emotion, and men did not cry. Despite his horrifying family dynamic, Bender does not cry. Instead he expresses anger, one of the only expressions that men were allowed to have.
Presidential Debate 2012 Tuesday’s debate was punchy between President Obama and Mitt Romney. The debate opened with testy exchanges on energy in which the president accused Romney of ignoring renewable power. But Romney, too, attacked Obama for allowing over rising gasoline prices and faking support for fossil fuels. What was out of the ordinary was that, in the last Presidential Debate, Romney had been the aggressor while Obama was calm and not as irritated. In my personal opinion, I think Obama showed that he can lead the U.S. even in crucial times and that he will fight for us and still manage to keep a positive attitude.
Warren G. Harding once declared, "America's present need is not heroics, but healing; not nostrums, but normalcy; not revolution, but restoration; not agitation, but adjustment…” A Democratic leader, William Gibbs McAdoo, called Harding's speeches "an army of pompous phrases moving across the landscape in search of an idea. "1 Their very murkiness was effective, since Harding's view on the League of Nations remained unclear. As it turned out he was against the League of Nations, but this was not found out until after he became the twenty-ninth president. As a result of rarely taking a stand on an issue, he had few enemies to make any. Who would have suspected that the man to succeed Woodrow Wilson, America's most visionary President, would be a man who some considered one of the worst?
I think that Presidential action was somewhat passive throughout the 1940s and 1950s. In particular Dwight Eisenhower failed to respond to the calls for greater equality as, although he was not actively racist, he was reluctant to lead the country into the next step of improving civil rights. I would say that the responsibility for improving civil rights should fall onto another individual which was Earl Warren. Despite the President calling him the ‘biggest damned-fool I’d ever made’, he was the one that destroyed the legal basis of segregation whilst in his role as Supreme Chief Justice. However, it would not be fair to say that Presidential action was non-existence.
There were many times when Phineas did something wrong and simply talked his way out of it. When the boys skipped dinner, which was not allowed, they were confronted about it. Phineas told a lie about getting ready for the war. These lies came to him naturally, and being outgoing certainly helped being a smooth-talker. On page 18, Gene admitted his envy towards Phineas.
This is because all wars are won on politics, if the government have the support of the people; the likelihood is that their war effort will be successful. It also highlights the key man that turned the screw of public opinion, Walter Cronkite. As seen in C, Cronkite exclaimed to the whole country “What the hell is going on? I thought we were winning this war.” This obviously had a massive affect on opinion, and polls show a drop around the time of this exclamation. This was as Hall rightly says in C, a “Rude awakening to the realities of the war that prompted a re-evaluation of the nation’s commitment.” This is similar to Source A in the way that it refuses to focus on the statistics of the offensive, but look at the consequences of the assault, with the privilege of hindsight.