1) What differences are there between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution in regards to the Legislative branch of government? A.O.C.-no executive with power. President of U.S. merely presided over Congress, 13/13 needed to amend Articles, 9/13 needed to approve legislation. Constitution- Executive branch headed by President who chooses Cabinet and has checks on power of judiciary and legislature, 2/3 of both houses of Congress plus 3/4 of state legislatures or national convention, 50%+1 of both houses plus signature of President. 2) What differences are there between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution in regards to the Executive branch of government?
The first way is if two-thirds of both the House of Representatives and the Senate vote in favor of said amendment. All of the twenty-seven existing amendments have been proposed this way. (Sidlow & Henschen, 2012) The second way and amendment can be proposed is if two-thirds of state legislators call for a national amendment convention. In this case congress is required to call for such a convention,
In the American congressional government all bills have to pass both houses of congress, then the bill is sent to the President to be either signed or vetoed. The Presidential involvement is minimal, and essentially the bill to law process is the job of both houses of congress. However, in the Canadian Parliamentary system of government; the Prime Minister and the cabinet are largely responsible for all legislation. The Prime Minister is also a member of the House of Commons, and therefore, takes part in the readings of bills, and has the ability to vote on a bill, just as any other member of parliament. Furthermore, neither the Prime Minister, nor the cabinet signs a bill once it has been passed; rather the Governor General signs the bill.
The US constitution is commonly described as being very rigid. This stems from the fact that it is codified – laid down in one singular sovereign document, which sets out both the powers and limitations of each distinct branch of government, for instance the fact that each year the President has the power to make the ‘State of the Union’ address, where he outlines what he wants Congress to debate and pass laws on. These enumerated powers have stayed the same ever since the Constitution was drawn up. Furthermore, the US has a notoriously difficult amendment process. First a bill must be passed in both houses of Congress with a super-majority of two-thirds.
In order to be ratified, the amendment has to be first proposed. To be proposed, an amendment had to be voted by two-thirds of the both houses of Congress or by a national constitutional convention called by Congress at the request of two-thirds of the state legislatures. The latter one has never been used in history. The second process is ratification. An amendment is ratified if three-fourths of the states legislatures voted for it or by conventions in three-fourths of the states.
The Executive Branch is made up of the President and Cabinet. There main job is to enforce the laws when they are made. They also command military, make treaties, and when elected the President absolutely has to give a State of Union address. Again, they have power to check on the other two branches. Over the Legislative Branch it was the power to veto bills.
If Congress doesn’t agree with the impoundment of funds, the president is required to spend the money. The act also requires presidents to notify Congress of delays in spending. Impeachment: Presidents can be removed upon impeachment and conviction. The House votes to indict the president. The impeached president must be convicted by a 2/3 vote of the Senate (which sits as a court, hears the
Both houses have to pass a bill before it becomes a law. An other advantage is allows for representation on a reasonably equitable footing for both large and small states. Only the House can impeach a President or executive officer in government. Then the Senate plays judge and jury in all impeachments bought on by the House. The disadvantages are the recurrent gridlock seen in Congress, even if the a House passes a bill it still has to go to the Senate.
U.S. Constitutional Amendment Proposal Amendment Proposal In this paper Team C will discuss the pros and cons of amending the Constitution to give voters the power to enact or reject laws by a ballot initiative as a direct method in addition to the legislative authority of Congress. If this amendment were to pass, Amendment 28 of the United States Constitution would read: A law enacted by Congress may be repealed by a call for a popular vote via ballot initiatives if at least three quarters of the states first hold a ballot initiative to repeal said law, and if upon holding the ballot initiative three quarters of the states vote for repeal the law in question shall be repealed without further action of Congress. Legislative Authority
Their definition of amendment meant an improvement or a revision to an original context written previously. There are a few ways that an amendment can be made or become part of the Constitution itself. Oddly enough, only one of those ways has ever been used since the signing of the Constitution and that is having “2/3 of the Senate and House approve the proposal and send it to the states for a vote. At that point, three-fourths must approve the proposed amendment.” (U.S. Constitution, 2010.). According to Article V of the Constitution, “The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by Congress;” (U.S. Constitution,