The results are based on the opposite sex, so I feel as if one is seeing how much one likes them the other will show how much they like them back. It is in human nature for bitter enemies to have a very high language styles matching, because they are angry and have similar emotions, words, and gestures that they tend to do when they are around each other. As I have learned in the article and in my scores, we really connect well with complete and total strangers rather than someone that you have known for many years. When talking in synch I would agree with that only because if that person is your type you would most likely
Also, when the perpetrator acts in an agreeable manner or has made strong amends, the victim perceives the perpetrator as unlikely to repeat the offense, which keeps the relationship healthy. (Luchie et al.) After two meta-analysis studies, and two longitudinal studies with married couples, the authors confirmed their hypotheses. They found that over time if one tends to forgive the other spouse, and their spouse’s agreeableness level is high, self-respect and self-concept clarity remained high, where low agreeableness level resulted in the doormat effect: where the forgivers self respect diminishes over time. Also when the partner made weak amends, self-concept clarity and self-respect went down over time as well, damaging mental health.
(Par. 6) This is a very interesting finding as most people think that they understand each other better than they actually do. Especially in spousal relationships, we believe that we are on the same wave-length; therefore, to discover how common misunderstandings are because of simple communication barriers is fascinating. These miscommunications may be a large part of the rising divorce rates. When couples feel that they understand each other completely, however, are communicating on different levels, it can be very hard to understand why the communication is failing.
Due to the closeness in relationships between love ones they feel as if they know what the other person is thinking or feeling. When in actuality you or the love one should be really listening to what it is that is being said. It seems more convenient to our relationships and lives that we always understand or know exactly what our love one is thinking or wants. Believing this in my opinion is the reason why there is such poor communication among close relationship. My husband and I went to high school together but weren’t really close.
It showed his shallowness because I thought he had looked over speeches of ‘love for him’ that was embellished by his older daughters so much’ Sir, I love you more than words can wield the matter…’ that he had no sense to realize how fake they were in comparison to Cordelia’s honesty ‘I am sure my love’s more richer than my tongue’. Lear’s angry response to Cordelia’s simple speech shows his desire and stubbornness for others to flatter him ‘Mend your speech a little’ ‘Nothing can come of nothing’. I think the mistakes Lear makes and his anger towards Kent from page 2 onwards shows his extreme pride as
In my opinion, it makes me feel good to be liked by most. I feel it is less stressful to have enemies. I understand you cannot make everyone like you, so I truly believe in the saying, “Keep your friends close and your enemies closer”. I tend to upset easily when faced with conflict and try to avoid it at all cost. I also believe I am very generous to a fault, friendly all of the time, overly sympathetic, and spoil people with kindness.
With the option of having an unlimited amount of friends, there is nothing really special about posting these messages for the public to view. Social networking websites not only hurt the idea of a real friendship as networkers often conclude what they think about someone just by viewing a page of information about them, but they pose many social problems and threats that are easy to encounter. One real problem that social networking websites have is that they give users the ability to manage their friends by importance by ranking them in numerical order. Rosen explains how “social networking sites also encourage the bureaucratization of friendship” as teenagers are now able to “manage their friendships” (233). The fact that teenagers can now manage friendships directly shows how these networking sites ignore real friendship.
Response Overall, I liked this article. The facts and all that was in there was true as it is going on right now. I mean I have seen people that chose to live with their partners (cohabiting) without having rules set for them. This makes one of the individuals in the relationship easier for them to exist from these kinds of relationships than it is with being
To others, we must seem at best unbalanced, at worst irresponsible, for our choices - choices we regarded, and still regard, as entirely wise and proper. The disapprovers are entitled to their opinion, of course. But it can become irksome when strangers, confronted with the sight of my beloved family, offer unsolicited judgments. The smiles and even the pointing fingers don't bother me; I try to follow the idea of judging others favorably, to assume the best: here, that the smilers and pointers are happy for us. But commentators like the fellow in the airport who snidely query-editorialized, "Catholic or careless?"
The story questioned me whether or not this was a dream or reality. Whichever it was will still haunt him for the rest of his life. • Analysis: After I researched the story I found that no one clearly concluded whether Goodman Brown’s journey was a dream or reality. While he was on the journey to his own defense he did try to hold a good regard for his wife, even though he did the wrong thing and left her. Before Goodman Brown left the house, Faith begged him to stay.