Colonial Ideology Essay

320 Words2 Pages
"the Seemingly Innocent Descriptions of Landscape" Many European travel writers wrote about Malaysia and represented it as an "archetypal garden". This name suggests "paradise; innocense; inspoiled beauty; fertility" (Guerin et al 189) The Europeans were fascinated with the country, that is why explorers, naturalists and tourists went there and the rsult was a variety of texts which were written to portray the Malay Peninisula and North and West Borneo. The "archetypal garden consistently appeared in such writings" (Siti Nuraishah Ahmed 2). For example James Brook described the rainforest using distinctly Edenic imagery "nature fresh from the bosom of creation…stamped with the same impress she originally bore". On the other hand, Isabella Bird described the Malayan forests as "a huge spread of foliage, bearing glorious yellow blossoms of delicious fragranc" (Bird 135) These travel writings have participated in building a whole body of knowledge about Malaysia. However, those seemingly innocent descriptions of landscape hide signs of colonial ideology (Siti Nuraishah Ahmed 7). Actually, Zawiah Yahya in Resisting Colonialist Discourse (2003) calls for readers to be aware of the colonial discourse at work within thosetravel writings. He also insisted on the need to read critically the textual representations of Malaysia during the colonial period. On her part, Mary Louise Pratt in her study Imperial Eyes, Travel Writing and Transculturation (1992) sheds light on the textual representation of the colonies (Siti Nuraishah Ahmed 8). She observed that "the traveller often portrays himself in the narrative as Adam alone in his garden…in the writing, people seem to disappear from the garden as Adam approaches…"(Pratt 51). This "suggests that the Garden of Eden is a significant image in the representation of colonized land by Europeans, while the motif of
Open Document