Colonial Conquest And Resistance

767 Words4 Pages
Instructor’s Name: Mallam Balarebe Salisu Assignment Name: Resistance to Colonial Rule Date: October, 07 2012. Colonial Conquest and Resistance The general pattern used by the British to dominate Northern Nigeria was military conquest. In some areas, conquests were preceded by fictitious signing of agreements and treaties. But within the general pattern of piecemeal conquest were other noticeable styles necessitated by the local peculiarities of the concerned polity. While in the centralised states, especially the former emirates of the Sokoto Caliphate like Kontagora, Zaria, Bauchi and Kano, a devastating singular military onslaught was enough to coerce the polities into qualified submission, in Ebiraland the British had to contend with incessant and persistent opposition which lasted nearly a decade and half. While the established centralised and hierarchical administrative structures of, for instance, Zaria and Kano enabled the British to instantly extend their political control, the lack of a centralised order of command in Ebiraland before the advent of the British compounded colonial conquest and occupation for the alien invaders. Despite these observations, it is interesting to note that some Ebira notables collaborated with the invading British forces. The first generation of British agents, viz. Atta Omadivi, Owudah Adidi, Akpata Ihima and Ozigizigi Opoh, were in this category. Whether they were traitors or not depends on the analysis. Thus it is a truism that in the occupation or threat to occupation of land by individuals or a group of foreigners, there are always internal-cum-domestic collaborators. In the final analysis, that Ebiraland succumbed to British occupational force could be explained from many angles. The British had superior fire power. Their maxim-guns were the type the Ebira never comprehended. Ebira bows,

More about Colonial Conquest And Resistance

Open Document