College Football Pros And Cons

790 Words4 Pages
Body I. The BCS does not get the best two teams. A. 1998 Tulane1999 Marshall, 2004 Auburn and Utah, 2006 Boise State B. , 2007 Hawaii, 2008 Utah and Boise State go undefeated and left out C. of the national championship game. 1. All finish undefeated but Hawaii lost its bowl game. 2. 2008 the Utah and Boise State go undated and didn’t get picked. USC, Texas, Alabama, Penn State and Ball State had one loss. B. 2001 Neberska had one and so so did Oreogon. Neberska was taken over oreagon even though they just lost. Nebeskra was killed the the national championship game. D. 2000 Oklahma was undefeated and there were 5 teams with one loss. E. One loss Flordia State was picked to play oklama even though their F. were ranked lower then the one loss…show more content…
The BCS does not get the best two teams , it does not give a fair chance for all division one teams, and we get a controversial national champion. College football needs to have a playoff. They would not have Clincher After Utah went was the only undefended team in college football. Utah’s attorney general Mark Shurtleff is investigating the Bowl Championship Series for a possible violation of federal antitrust laws because Utah was left out of the championship in 2008 and in 2004.There are over 300,000 web sites about BCS reform. is leading the with spokesman Anthony Davis a two time college football national champion and congressman Gary Miller is trying to pass legislation to get playoffs in college football. BCS 3 Even our President Obama has said, “I think it's about time we had playoffs in college football. I'm fed up with these computer rankings and this that and the other. "If you've got a bunch of teams who play throughout the season and many of them have one loss or two losses, there's no clear, decisive winner," Obama said. "We should be creating a playoff

More about College Football Pros And Cons

Open Document