Miller draws parallels between the naming of names in the play and those asked to give names in the USA in the 1950s when McCarthyism was taking place. Just like in the play, people would be arrested with very little evidence and it was very difficult to prove you were innocent once you were accused. One of the main characters is John Proctor, husband to Elizabeth Proctor and a feared, though respected member of this “New Jerusalem’s” community. John Proctor is a man who has some flaws, but also many good points to his personality. Various characters throughout the play highlight these differing aspects of Proctor’s personality.
You don’t, because our court system, in theory, in America is supposed to be based upon the idea of “innocent until proven guilty” not “innocent until proven stereotypically likely to have committed the crime”. In the news we often hear discussion of biased trials, or a person who spent their life in prison because of the racial stereotypes which influenced their jury. A stereotype is a perception that people have of a group of people. Stereotypes, plainly speaking, do not belong in our justice system. We hear about negative stereotypes in everyday life.
Victims’ Right’s Vengeance Derrick White University of Phoenix CJA/324: Ethics in Criminal Justice Instructor: Amy Gordon 9/23/12 When reviewing the information about the victims’ rights in America, I personally stand with it. Although a person is convicted or suspected of committing a crime they also still have rights. Some individuals fail to use them properly, because they figure since they are guilty of a crime there’s nothing they can do, which is not true. Government cannot deprive victims of their rights. These systems are made to view things from every angle possible and notice that the individual made good faith efforts to follow the law, who knows what will happen.
Defenses and Due Process Kylee Rivers CJS/220 Defenses and Due Process According to Gardner and Anderson (2011), an individual is only charged for a crime he/she committed intentionally. He suggests that such a crime must be without defense so that an individual is declared guilty. Defenses are situations that can stop or lessen the guilt in a case. Presentations of evidence for such situations ensure an accused person is defended from guilt. According to Gardner and Anderson (2011), the common elements of defense include insanity, entrapment and self-defense.
This ethnography conducted by Bourgois and Schonberg really highlighted the problems of racism among the Edgewater community. I was honestly shocked to learn how prevalent racism was among the homeless community. I had previously thought that because these people were in such poor conditions, trying to do anything to survive, they would look past such divisions such as racism in order to help themselves survive and get back on their feet. This wasn’t the only thing that surprised me however. It was the fact that the homeless addicts weren’t just sitting around getting high and injecting heroin, but were actually trying to go out and get jobs and homes once again.
Tom Robinson is a black man who is accused of raping Mayella Ewell. In Maycomb County, there is still serious racism going on and Blacks have not been treated right. However, Atticus still decides to take the case and defend Tom Robinson even though he knows that town’s people would insult him and his children. Although Atticus tried his best to prove Tom is innocent and he actually proves it, he still loses the trial. Despite the truth that he lost, Maycomb makes a “baby-step”( p.289).
Just by giving a few examples one could speculate that the confession isn’t valid and is influenced by the author’s voice. Joseph Mountain was indeed a criminal but to call him a rapist is false. The fact that Joseph was an African American gave society to the right to call him a rapist and execute him just because he tried to talk to two white women. What else is known is that since he has a history of pretty crime this makes the story stick to some readers but I have debunked the accusation. It is clear that
In other crime types once the intent is created it is followed by the execution of the act. The intent and act is not misinterpreted. In contrast, due to the element of disguise in white-collar crime the intent is blurred and frequently can only be obtained by interpretation. (Stephen Rosoff, 2010) White-collar criminals can only be successful if the victim is ignorant and negligent. Key differences between white-collar crime and other types of crime is that white-collar crime generally requires the victim to comply in being victimized in contrast to murder, robbery, assault or rape.
The social strain theory states that the person commits the crime because they are angry because they are not able to succeed economically as he/she would like to. The cultural deviance theory states that a person does not feel that he/she will every succeed economically and will fight or do whatever he/she has to so that he/she can get what they want in life. The social learning theory states that a person learns a crime from others. Each of these theories is reasons that a person may commit a crime. In Tent City felons are divided into different racial groups.
Finally, there are many misconceptions and injustices surrounding the defense. I think it is impossible to know exactly what someone else is really thinking or feeling and that committing a crime is wrong no matter what the perpetrator claims his or her mental state was. I do believe the insanity defense should remain in action, because mentally ill felons do require some special treatment as opposed to regular felons. It may cause a lot of problems and controversy, but at the same time it allows mentally ill individuals the option of a fair trial. If a defendant is found NGRI or “guilty but mentally ill,” I think that he or she should be placed in a mental hospital instead of being released without treatment.