However, the vehicle appeared to have committed a traffic violation based off of Smith’s perception. In the case of Whren v. United States, this case can back up Smiths’ reason to pull the driver over based off of probable cause to believe a traffic violation has occurred. Once Officer Smith began to approach the automobile, she then had reasonable suspicion of the vehicle based off of its description of an earlier crime. This gives law enforcement a reason to conduct a pat down. The pat down of the driver was very much legal based off of reasonable suspicion of the vehicle’s description.
Her argument had a claim, a ground, and a warrant. She supported her stand with evidence from her own observation, such as the fact that the elder people crossing the street could hardly make it across due to the lack of time allocated. Although her supporting arguments seemed reasonable, but I do not see why jaywalking should be condoned. First of all, jaywalking is a crime, and there is a good reason why it is a crime, it is a very dangerous act. The chances of getting hit by a car when jaywalking is very high, as the driver does not expect the pedestrian to cross the street where there is no traffic light.
This was then said to be justified because the car was on public streets so the fourth amendment doesn’t apply. The court of appeals denied the argument implying that you can’t track a person’s movements for an extensive amount of time, because the government would gather more information about your everyday life, then just the location of the car. The Constitution is potentially violated in this case because the use of privacy-invading technologies. Providing the courts with all the evidence reveals this case as an unconstitutional search. This illustrates the conflict between the freedom of individual privacy and the order from the government’s political values.
The worst thing about identity theft is that you can’t get a new social security card. Your credit is ruined, and you are left with the same social security number tied to da destroyed credit history. Additionally, credit bureaus do not proceed with identity theft prosecution unless the damages are considered great enough and within their specific time ranges. This paper shares valuable information about ways to protect yours self, and how to proceed should your identity become compromised. How to Protect Yourself from Identity Theft Identity is important to all young adults starting out in this world.
I don’t steal because I don’t want to be stolen. I obey laws in expectation of others thinking and doing the same. I have been taught by my parents that it is basically bad to break the law. I feel like if I don’t obey the law in way that I would disappoint them and never hear the end of it from my parents. “Speeding may seem to be a harmless offense at first glance.
Anthony could then sue Washington for hitting him with her car. However, since Anthony was negligent as well for running into the street I do not think that he would be able to win in the state of Maryland since he was also at fault. Anthony could then sue the doctor for negligence since she owes Anthony a higher standard of care since she is acting in her professional capacity. She has breached her duty to
Moreover, the chat on the cellphone is what distracts people. If texting while driving is eventually banned in the United States, could it be enforced? Some argue that police cannot enforce drivers who text. Although, this method is direct there is another strategy that enforces drivers who text. The high visibility mobilization strategy is a method that the government uses to aware people of new laws.
Criminal behavior would all be situational are we assuming that I’m a law abiding normal citizen or what. If this is pertaining to the me here and now then these factors are kind of pointless to make most of them minus the drug issue. Then again what types of criminal behavior are we talking is it j-walking shoplifting grand theft auto or anything like these. Honesty and dishonesty are always factors in self-report studies simply because when someone lies or is dishonest on a self-report study they then jeopardies the whole study there is no real way to tell if someone is telling the truth on a study or just simply filling in the blanks the way they think that someone would like them filled
One of the most common arguments deals with respecting the Constitution. Racial profiling should be eliminated in routine traffic stops because it leads to a violation of civil rights, poor relationships between police officers and citizens, and decreased urban safety. Racial profiling violates citizens’ rights in a few different ways. The fourth amendment reads, “The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated”, as recited by West Des Moines’ police captain, Scott Wiegert. A traffic stop on the basis of race violates the fourth amendment because the officer can make the victim feel violated instead of secure.
Gun control ENG/102 8/11/10 Brian Kevin Gun control 1 Introduction: Gun control advocates have cried foul, because of the Supreme Court 2010 ruling they believe will damage the chances gun control laws to reduce crime. While many people consider gun control to be too restrictive, advocates are of the mind that we should remove all the guns, at all cost. The Supreme Court ruling has mandated that state and city governments have no choice but to respect the Second Amendment of their citizens. While the ruling does not completely abolish current gun restrictions, it does weaken the ability of the local government to