In this essay, first the arguments of the Federalist Paper and the Supreme ruling of Marbury v. Madison will be discussed. Then these two sources will be compared and the similarity and difference will be clarified. Finally, the necessity of judicial review in the checks and balance system and its importance will be proved. One of the most important features of the jurisdiction, Hamilton stated, was the complete independence of the branch from the other two branches. The tenure in which the judges hold during good behavior is their biggest protection and creates the separation from other branches.
This is true, but to interpret the laws and judge their constitution are the two special functions of the court. The fact that the courts are charged with determining what the law means does not suggest that they will be justified in substituting their will for that of
2. What are the differences between the two? Basically, Judicial Activism means that judges use their own political and personal thoughts to influence/help rule on a legal matter. Judicial Restraint means that judges do not use their own political and personal thoughts to influence/help rule on a legal matter. 3.
According to the textbook the Constitution has three functions the first being to set up a structure for the federal government and rules for modifying the constitution, second provide powers for branches of the government and third to grant protections and liberties for United States Citizens from illegal or unlawful government practices. After understanding that the Constitution lays the ground work for the established legal system as we know it. Along with the guidelines that are followed lawfully ethics and values plays a role in how laws are followed and interpreted. Different laws address different issues and pertain to specific areas. Established laws are also implemented to safeguard citizens from harm, possible inequities and illegal behavior.
1. What is the definition of law? Law is define by the system of rules which a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members and which it may enforce by the imposition of penalties. 2. What are some historical origins of a civil law legal system?
Describe three major philosophical theories of law. The principal objective of analytic jurisprudence has traditionally been to provide an account of what distinguishes law as a system of norms from other systems of norms, such as ethical norms. All forms of natural law theory subscribe to the Overlap Thesis, which is that there is a necessary relation between the concepts of law and morality. According to this view, then, the concept of law cannot be fully articulated without some reference to moral notions.The Conventionality Thesis emphasizes law’s conventional nature, claiming that the social facts giving rise to legal validity are authoritative in virtue of some kind of social convention. The Separability Thesis, at the most general level, simply denies naturalism’s Overlap Thesis; according to the Separability Thesis, there is no conceptual overlap between the notions of law and morality.
Other source of America law is administrative law it consist of rules, regulations, orders and decisions of administrative agency or governmental organization. This law performs a specific functions and rules issued by administrative agencies, since they make their own regulations it is not usually found in the statutes, with stringent procedures individuals must follow to obtain assistance from the agency and this is how administrative law is impacted. In addition, the sources that amount to mandatory authority is primary sources it refers to cases, statutes, or regulations that the court must follow because it is binding on the court. Even though, lower courts are required to follow decisions from higher courts in the same jurisdiction. Example: You are in Federal District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
Checks and balances are put into place so that no one area of the government can have full control or become too powerful. In the three branches checks and balances vary and are essential. The Legislative branch given the power to make laws and is there to check the Executive and Judicial branch. The Executive branch is given the power to carry out the laws and is there to check the Legislative and Judicial branch. The Judicial branch is given power to interpret the laws and is there to check the Legislative and Executive branch.
The Supreme Court takes part in judicial review which is examination by a country's courts of the actions of the legislative, executive, and administrative branches of government to ensure that those actions conform to the provisions of the constitution. “Judicial review enables the courts to protect constitutional principles against attacks by elected officials” (Dye 326). Since they are not elected by the people many believe that it would be better if we had restraints on the judicial power. Justices seek both to advance favored policies and to win approval from audiences they care about. They are likely to care a great deal about their reputations among other elites, including academics, journalists, other judges, fellow lawyers, members of other interest groups, and their friends and neighbors.
Stare Decisis were used as a guarantee to make sure the precedent was followed. These various traditional laws created by King William and Henry II help to create and mold the modern day laws found within the United States Court systems. (Schmalleger & Hall, Chapter 1,3 and 4, 2010) Dual Court System The modern American Court system is divided between the federal court system and the state court system known as the dual court system. The dual court system uses Federalism which are