Christian Counseling Book Review

1242 Words5 Pages
4-MAT Review: Psychology, Theology, and Spirituality in Christian Counseling By Mark R. McMinn, Ph.D. Angelique Lawhenore, Student ID 130818 Liberty University COUN 506 August 6, 2009 Author: Mark R. McMinn Publisher: Tyndale House Publishers, Carol Stream, IL Date: 1996 Abstract This book was written by McMinn (1996) to directly address “two secret places in counselors’ lives.” The first place is in the counseling office and the second place is the spiritual life of the Christian counselor (p. xi). The main issue, or challenge, at hand for the Christian counselor is to learn how to integrate not only psychology and theology, but to also include the aspect of spiritual formation in the counseling process.…show more content…
In each of these areas he debunks the traditional question of “Should counselors pray (or use Scripture, confront sin, etc) with clients?” and instead asks the more sensitive and discerning question of, “Which forms of prayer (scripture, sin, confrontation, etc) should be used with which clients and under which circumstances?” (p. 65). He provides in depth definitions and explanations as to how each of these interventions apply to both the counselor and the client and can lead to true healing in all three aspects of the client’s life. The conclusion of the book identifies McMinn’s (1996) concept of the multitasking counselor. He defines multitasking as a counselor who can consider the three different psychological categories (psychology, theology, and spirituality) of the client’s mental health at a time. He states, “The most effective Christian counselors are able to process several ideas simultaneously” (p. 269). He further states, “Counselors who are not capable of multitasking end up treating only part of the problem” (p.…show more content…
At this time, I do not see myself ever utilizing the concept of direct censure. I feel that this would place me in a position of authority with my clients; it would create a potential feeling of hierarchy between the client and me. I understand the need to challenge a person to discover for themselves where they are not thinking or behaving in ways that are congruent with their faith, however, I don’t think it is up to the therapist to be the one to point out sin. I hope that if I am wrong, the Holy Spirit will convict me and guide me into a clearer understanding of how I can incorporate this without creating potential difficulties in the therapeutic
Open Document