Chisholm (Free Will) vs. Ryle ("Ghost of a Machine")

1233 Words5 Pages
Chisholm (Free will) vs. Ryle (“Ghost of a Machine”) What is free will? Is it within us? Or is it something we much obtain? According the Webster’s dictionary, free will is “the power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at ones own discretion. Within this essay, a understanding of Chisholm’s argument will be looked upon, Ryle’s argument will, as well, be analyzed, and then a comparison of both Chisholm and Ryle will be complete, with an emphasis if Ryle’s theory of the “ghost of the machine” is seen in free will. According to Chisholm, he feels that individuals are morally responsible for their acts only, but only, if they have free will. He explains this in an example of one man shooting another man. Chisholm says “he did perform the act that was also in his power not to perform, and then it could not have been caused or determined by any event that was not itself within this power either to bring about or not to bring about (p. 481)”. Chisholm then continues and explains another hypothetical situation. This time a man is under hypnosis, and he, without knowing, complies with what he is made to do. After, Chisholm then tells us to use the same last situation and replace “hypnosis” with the man’ s “desires and beliefs” instead, and the same result would occur and he could not have done otherwise, because it was out of his control. “So the question becomes, is he responsible for the desires and beliefs he happens to have? (p. 481)”. Chisholm uses these examples to point out the problem, which is within the determinist’s argument. According to a determinist, beliefs and desires are under the control of the man and he has complete control, therefore, he can refrain from the acquisition of those beliefs and desires; however, under the assumption if determinism is absolutely true then that means that there had do be a previous
Open Document