This method is wrong because it had bad consequences. Parents can use the correct method of education when the child baby. Many parents never learned from their own childhood that there are positive ways of relating to children. For example when punishment does not accomplish the desired goals, and if the parent is unaware of alternative methods, punishment can escalate to more frequent and dangerous actions against the child. Parents believe that beating is a means of discipline and kind of education.
Smacking/Spanking of Children Should Not Be Banned A very debatable issue is if spanking children should be banned or not. Many people are on both sides. Some think that it is a form of discipline, and it will help the child to behave. Others think that it is a form of abuse, and if adults cannot hit adults, it should be illegal for adults to strike them. There is a difference, however, between punching your child in the face, and spanking him on the bottom when he is misbehaving.
After spanking children, they will stop what they are doing at the time and will immediately obey their authority. However, a short time later the children will forget about their misbehavior, but the feeling of the abuse will still remain in their recollection. Psychological control is another way parents can punish their child. This method “uses guilt and the child’s gratitude toward the parent”(307). When this is being portrayed, parents may use signs of disappointment and sadness to control the child’s behavior, causing them feel guilt-ridden and upset for what they did.
Spanking is wrong Spanking is one of the most common forms of discipline used by parents. Although the very same parents do not condone hitting people, they believe spanking is a quick and effective technique for correcting unwanted behavior (Ramsburg 1). Ironically, by using violent and hurtful means of discipline, parents are instilling negative values in their children. The moral consequences of spanking children can have lifelong negative effects. For young children, parents are their primary role models.
This is not true. When a child gets a spanking it is on the buttocks and it is only a few swats, not repeated hitting. Spanking is one thing and beating is another. When there is a tough decision between the two just be calm and go about what will be the best for the situation. If a parent feels like they will not be able to stop when spanking and it would lead to beating then they should use one of the other forms of discipline.
If parents correct their children, then the children learn right from wrong. Golden’s and Shaffer’s views that toy weapons present violence are alike because they share a similar attitude towards violence. The authors believe that it is wrong to let children play with toy weapons at such an early age. Toy weapons teach them that violence solves problems, and it is the parents’ responsibility to teach their children their values in regards to violence. Another view that Golden’s and Shaffer’s articles share relates toy weapons to death.
Is it the only method of discipline that works? Now what a lot of parents don’t know is that, not only does smacking have short term mental and physical effects, it also has long term psychological effects which is why I believe smacking should be banned. Research shows that smacking undermines children’s confidence, weakens their emotional relationships and encourages the use of violence to solve any conflict with people around them. Psychologists say that alcoholism, depression, masochistic fantasies and suicidal thoughts arise from being smacking during childhood. Let’s just stop for a minute and think about this, how on earth can we expect children to play with other children without hitting each other, if we as
Even parents also unintentionally conduct emotional abuse onto their child when they said awful things to their kids, failed to give needed attention which is desired by their children as well as scaring their children with myth. In our discussion paper, we will examine into the attachment theory derived by John Bowlby by looking further into the four types of attachment, namely secure attachment, insecure attachment which include resistant attachment, avoidant attachment and disorganized-disoriented attachment and how it leads to emotional and psychological child abuse. Appropriate pictures will be illustrated to enhance the understanding of attachment theory. Attachment Theory The main theorist who proposed the attachment theory came from the joint work of John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth (Ainsworth & Bowlby, 1991) . Derived from the
Should parents be banned from smacking their children??? Banning smacking would make parents feel like the Government is going too far, taking over the parental role...' Although I would like to advise the parents that the government is just trying to help them and their kids to be safe. I am Teen Thomas, who would like to prove that parents should not be smacking their kids and the government should make it illegal. I would like to acknowledge that smacking is generally not an effective means of discipline, as well as smacking can be a lead to more extreme forms of physical abuse. Indeed it is proven that smacking is a violation of the child's right to be safe and it could cause long-term intelligence or psychological harm.
The behavior by bullies then is virtually encouraged as students become afraid or feel that the administration will not react appropriately should they inform them of a bulling situation. Students at this age will make mistakes and react inappropriately occasionally in response to a bullying situation if they feel there is no help from the school. Clearly each incident needs to be investigated and any punishment should be appropriate based on the circumstances involved. It is clear the principles only goal in dealing with behavior issues in the school is to indentify, isolate, intimidate, and remove. This simply will not work if no effort is made to correctly indentify were and with who the problem started.