To know that the child will suffer and eventually die is difficult to accept but that is when religion and faith is important. Then the question comes is this God wanted for these parents and why. It is not for anyone to decide but the Lord who gets to live or die and when. Faith and trust in God will not provide all the answers but will ease the loss of the child and the parents will have the joy of being parents for a short
This is because a woman’s virginity is seen as their holy innocence- you can only loose it once, so it can not be repented for. Co-habitation may be seen as placing yourself in temptations path. On the other hand, a relativist Christian may argue that it does not matter if a couple live together before they are married, so long as the couple love and are committed to each other, and believe that marriage may follow in the future. This way the couple can see if they are compatible to live with each other before marriage, as divorce is frowned upon. Following on from that, some people may argue that living with someone before marriage in a sexual relationship devalues it, because if the relationship is not fully committed and has troubles, it makes it easier to just walk away.
RELIGIOUS BELIEF SHOULD BE A MATTER OF CHOICE; SHOULD NOT PARENTS TEACH THEIR CHILDREN ABOUT RELIGION. My interpretation of this particular statement is that parents should be teaching their children about religion however, it is up to the parents and the religion they follow of whether they should teach their children about religion or not. Although to respect your parents is one of the Ten Commandments in Judaism, it may not always be done because of the relationship you have with them or sometimes you wish not to do what they have told you. This links to the choices and decisions of themselves and to learn to be independent for the real world. Some people think that when they are a certain age, the children will make their own decision of whether to be a theist, agnostic or atheist because at the end of it all they are living in this world independently and I think they have the right to make their own decisions and choices so they can, see where their own choices take them through life.
Many Christians express their views against Euthanasia because of their belief in the Sanctity of Life, which declares no killing is acceptable or justifiable. On the other hand, due to modern changes in society, many Christians are in line with the belief of the quality of a person’s life rather than the sanctity. Overall, we can see that Euthanasia is indeed compatible with the changes in our modern society but not with the traditional view of the sanctity of life which some Christians still hold. Even though I’m against Euthanasia, the outcome was morally right. I think it was morally right as it put a person out of their misery, and since the court, the doctors and the nurses, and the parents had agreed to the death of Anthony Bland, and then I would allow this case to proceed.
Also, to respect and love your parents. The parents should govern their children. To restrain them in such a way and to not govern out of wrath and anger, for that could provoke their children to act out. A lot of their principles and practices come from their religion,
The babies had low birth weights and some required more medical intervention than others but all survived. Two of the children have cerebal palsy and one had to have spinal surgery to help him learn to walk. Critics felt the McCaughey’s were irresponsible to have that many children and felt they should have been required to use selective reduction. It was also felt if the McCaughey’s weren’t prepared to use selective reduction they shouldn’t have been allowed to use fertility treatment. Since the McCaughey’s had a fairly good outcome with the childrens health, critics are also afraid it will encourage others to carry multiple fetuses thinking it’s safe and reliable to do so.
Now I will explain situation ethics, the idea developed by priest Joseph Fletcher in the 1960’s. Situation ethics is deciding the best thing to do in a situation when we feel there are no particular moral guidelines to follow. Some people would describe situation ethics as a modern day dilemma, and that maybe it makes you more confused about a situation if you already had your mind partially made up- as it often comes to two conclusions that you have to decide which one is best; it does however help you make an informed decision. Some would argue that situation ethics is immoral because it gives everyone the chance to prove everything in a positive light, which surely is not beneficial for our society. Through practicing situation ethics, you show pragmatism, the Christian goal is love, and you must try and achieve love no matter what.
This can simply mediated by allowing baby designing. There you go. Some people may say that it’ll cause population growth but then again, the parents were going to have a baby anyways, designer baby or not so that population numbers would not reflect (in growth) the effect of allowing designer babies. Children should not suffer because the way they turned out was not what their parents, society, or even themselves wanted (Weebly 1). The fact that designer babies are a controversial topic is ridiculous.
They provide the necessary help to enable them to carry the pregnancy until the end, because the Bible 2Peter 3:9 said: “The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance”. Promiscuous sex is guilty, but babies are innocent. Adoption is a widely used in many countries. It involves the transfer of ownership of a child to other parents who would love to take care of it. Providing the necessary support like financial aid and psychological consultation to all coming mothers could serve as the best way to avoid deaths resulting from abortion.
The child gets chance to live and another family who may not be able to have children get a chance of experiencing the joy of having a baby. Second, the mother could keep her child. Who better to raise a baby than their own flesh and blood with the help of their family members and the father? Christians are those who lean more toward the anti-abortion side because the Bible clearly says not to murder. Those pro-abortion, generally do not consider a “fetus a human being when it is sufficiently developed to be capable of living outside the uterus,” they claim, “ a fetus is a fetus, not a human being” (Sarvis 21).