691 WordsApr 3, 20093 Pages
The modern history of this planet is studded with countless such names whose work imprinted nonpareil impressions on the life of humankind. However, catalogues of such entries fails to provide many characters that were neither politicians nor religious persons, but their charisma influenced far and wide, extensive and intensive affects on the subsequent generations. Geoffrey Chaucer is one such unique name whose work provided new fundaments to lift English language to novel heights of recognitions. And consequently we see name of Chaucer at such place where he cannot be second to anyone else. History of English literature admits Chaucer’s closeness to the oral traditions of England and supports strongly this idea that his work and style influenced coming generations of poets. Shakespeare too was no exception. That is why Chaucer’s particular dialect of English or the London dialect of the Middle English language, in due course of time was accepted as the written standard. Poetry and literature always serves to reflect social developments of the respective society and culture. The incident of The Norman Conquest in 1066 was one such landmark that had far too extensive implications not only on that era but also on the subsequent centuries. In the opinion of many critics this point of history serves as dividing line between the two important ages (i.e. old Anglo-Saxon England and the new Anglo Norman England). The Norman Conquest definitely had its percussions on all the departments of life and language too was no exclusion. It is understandable that this conquest did consequence to have French speaking people in the hierarchy or the ruling class. It had its due affect on the society, culture, literature and language. Although Daiches says in his book “A Critical History of English Language”, that Norman Conquest didn’t affected course of long-term development of


Open Document