He is past president of the American Political Science Association and also of the International Society of Political Psychology. Summary of Concepts The primary purpose of Leadership is to demonstrate that the process of leadership must be seen as part of the dynamics of power and conflict; that leadership must be linked to a collective purpose; and that the effectiveness of leaders must be judged by actual social change measured by intent and the satisfaction of human needs and expectations. The foundation for Burns’ leadership theory builds upon three fundamental concepts: power, purpose, and relationship. Power relates to leadership as both deal with influencing others. Leadership is a unique form of power where the leader induces followers to pursue specific goals that represent the values and motivations of both the leader and the followers.
In this article the authors examine individual and social factors that help to determine whether leaders will use their personal power to advance organizational goals or whether they will act to advance their own self-interest. Results demonstrated that although leaders often prioritize group goals, in situations where the individual thinks that their individual power is threatened leaders who were high on a trait called dominance motivation chose to work within the scope of their own self-interest at the expense of group goals. These findings underscore important traits that help to predict how and when a leader might choose personal power over the success and direction of the organization. I chose this article because it is well grounded in research and it is practical and useful for organizations. The authors’ arguments and hypotheses are grounded in evolutionary theories of power and leadership.
Leadership is the process of influencing an individual socially in order to accomplish a common task. According to Schein (2010), a leader is someone who guides the employees to achieve the organizational goals or the leader is someone whom people follow. There are various leadership theories that have been introduced in the world such as trait leadership theory, behavioural leadership theory, contingency theory and transactional and transformational leadership theory. In my opinion, each leadership theory has its own advantages and limitation when we apply it to the real world. This essay analyses the three leadership theories and its application in the real world: situational leadership, servant leadership and transformational leadership.
They are used in societies to create an almost ideal way of life. They are a way to get people to do what you want. Organisations/ Governments that strive for power will try to influence the ideology of a society to become what they want it to be by broadcasting their ideas. One can see from how much effort is put by governments etc. into selling their ideology to the people how important a role ideologies play.
I believe that managers’ effectiveness often depends on their styles of leadership, that is, their ability to influence others, either formally or informally. I think the style of leadership is entrepreneurial leadership. Entrepreneurial leaders are different depending on their personalities, but they are generally enthusiastic and passionate about their work and tend to take initiative. The leadership of L.L. Bean’s more focus on the corporation.
Address the following questions: § Define the term and concept of leadership traits, including those traits associated with successful leaders. § Expand upon the effect of personality and intelligence on a leader, including how one’s personality and level of intelligence impact their leadership success. § Present a minimum of two leadership studies or theories that discuss leadership traits. Propose/promote your theory on the subject of leadership traits, including those traits which you feel are important for aleader’s
Application of Transformational Leadership Transformational leadership provides what is typical of leadership who work in transforming context, a general way of thinking about leadership that’s focus on ideals, inspiration, innovations and individual concern. But it does not provide a clearly defined set of assumptions about what they should do in particular situation to be successful. Bass and Avolio (1990) suggested that transformational leadership can be taught to all people in organization, can be used in recruitment, selection and promotion and learning development. Also used in improving team effectiveness, decision making groups, quality enhancement and reorganization. People can use questionnaire to profiling leader’s strength and
Leadership styles consist of a pattern of behaviors that are used to influence people. An effective management style uses a set of behaviors that meet the needs of employers. A good leader should focus on the needs of an individual for accomplishing a specific task. When a leader is flexible to making adaptations to situations, the more successful one becomes in leadership. Empirical studies support there is no style that is necessarily the best or normative.
New Labour govern with a pragmatic stance, concentrating on making practical decisions that influence the UK, as oppose to Old Labour who were ideological, and looked at the best ways in which to manage society and react to current events. A famous quote, used by ex-Prime Minister Tony Blair in 1997 was “We were elected as New Labour, and we will govern as New Labour”. This signified the change in how the Labour Party acted. As a party formed for the working class people of Britain, Old Labour actively sough to attract the lower skilled, lower income members of society. The party designed and implemented its policies so that they would please and benefit the working class of Britain.
Charismatic leadership has its attributes and also traits. These were the leaders with exceptional qualities which made them almost god-like for their followers. Charismatic leaders appeal strongly to the values of the followers and it is this psychological bondage between the two which makes the charismatic leadership succeed. Charismatic leaders are most powerful in situations which require change. Originally, charisma referred to a gift from the Holy Spirit and used to denote the superhuman, supernatural qualities and characteristics of a holy prophet (Jayakody 2007).