With horror Rainsford realized that General Zaroff actually hunts humans. With this General Zaroff forces Rainsford to be hunted by him. The Most Dangerous Game is a good piece of literature. Countless elements that create a story are used by the author. Examples of personification are, “He struggled up to the surface and tried to cry out, but the wash from the speeding yacht slapped him in the face.” "Well done, your Burmese tiger trap claimed one of my best dogs!
Moreover, with his past life’s experience he has taught him to only express who he was through violence and conflict because he lacked the proper manner to combat the feelings he created for himself. He frequently misinterpreted himself through the events which unfolded from the external world surrounding him. Since many of these events were formulated from physical pain throughout the body, his mind could not move beyond these experiences so he freely chose to remain lost within this affliction and project the feelings he created for himself onto other people. Due to the fact that he freely chose to be lost within these experiences, instead of moving beyond them, an act of murder does not excuse the moral responsibility involved with the course of his actions. Thus, the main focus of this moral responsibility of his actions relates to the amount of freedom he was able to bears at the hand of this sort of liberation.
As other novels dishonestly romanticize and glorify war, Heller does the opposite. A main theme Heller tries to convey throughout the novel is that the reality of war is absurd and corrupt, as well as the people involved in war. Although Yossarian is selfish and untrustworthy, Heller slowly shows the reader that these seemingly dislikable characteristics of Yossarian show a type of heroism. As Yossarian evolves, the reader comes to realize that Yossarian’s obsession with preserving his life doesn’t necessarily emphasize his selfishness, but rather the value he puts on life. Throughout most of the novel, the reader follows Yossarian’s quest to escape the war,
Apocolypto Summary The film begins with a boy, Jaguar Paw, his father Flint, and their fellow tribesmen hunting tapir in the Mesoamerican jungle. Then they encounter a procession of traumatized and fearful refugees. The procession's leader explains that their lands have been ravaged, and asks for Flint Sky's permission to pass through the jungle. When Jaguar Paw and his tribesmen return to their village, Flint Sky tells his son not to let the procession's state of fear seep into him. The next morning, Jaguar Paw wakes from a nightmare to see strangers enter the village and set the huts on fire.
Throughout the book Fight Club by Chuck Palahniuk, the protagonist (who is not clearly named towards the end of the book) is narrorating the book. One who doesn’t read towards the end of the book would think that it is just the main character narrorating the story. This book goes very deep into the mind of the protagonist suprising the reader who maybe thought it was just a fighting book, with extra violence, and action. Tyler Durden, a man with a far different nature than the average civilized man. He has a hatred for consumer culture, and lives his life on the edge, not caring about organization, even destroying some of the consumer culture with help from his followers.
In Counterparts, Farrington’s world is a world full of adversity no doubt. In a day, Farrington’s adversity stretches from Farrington’s monotonous job and arrogant boss to his ridiculous drinking habits. The adversity of the day converts to anger that Farrington brings home to his family. Therefore, Counterparts illustrates to me that adversity in Farrington’s life consumed him, shaping his identity negatively. Farrington’s most striking adversity and as it looks, the source of adversity
LOTF- without MLA The Lord of the Flies helps one inherit the real thought behind William Goldings view on the true meaning of evil and savagery, painting images in ones mind while reading and writing as the characters become gradually more and more evil. Jack, Ralph and Simon are all affected by the innate evil of the boys on the island. The dehumanization, obsession with power and murders are all examples of savage behavior, which affects the characters as they slowly drift away from civilization and society. When the boys first arrive on the island, Jack is still trying to stay civilized but he eventually plunges into savagery. When Jack and Ralph first encounter the pig tangled in creepers, Jack has the opportunity to kill it but he hesitates.
Jekyll continues to lead a double life. He basks in the facade of his gentle, kind personality and respectable reputation as Dr. Jekyll but is still entirely enthralled by the “callous, violent, vile life” of which is Mr. Hyde’s. He finds the more he entertains his evil side, the harder it is to differentiate between his two personalities. When all is done, and Henry Jekyll is no longer amused by Edward Hyde’s narcissism and egomaniacal antics, he attempts to eradicate himself from Mr. Hyde. With doing so, he finds that he cannot fully return to his previous state of purity.
This results in Dimmesdale having to hide his guilt when he is out in public, which in return slowly destroys his soul because he usually is not put into a position where he must lie. If Dimmesdale is to confess his sin he will no longer have to hide it, just like Hester which will result in the mending of his body and soul. Secondly, since Dimmesdale is seen as such a pure and holy man it is extremely difficult for him to confess. When Dimmesdale has to hide his guilt he turns into a, “poor, miserable man! What right had infirmity like his to burden it with crime?
Ironically, Mercutio dies of a wound “occasioned partly by Romeo’s love, while Romeo, no less a man, will die not of a wound but of the poison he voluntarily takes for love” (Kahn 64). The men in the play are viewed to be under pressure. The fathers cannot perform as fathers and the sons cannot perform as sons. “The fathers cannot enforce the law so long as they themselves are living in a self-imposed condition of ‘mutiny’ or ‘rebellion’” (Appelbaum