2. For each social group, list the way it used power or suffered powerlessness. The upper and ruling class used power to make them superior to theses who they thought were beneath them, who were the middle class but note specifically the poor. They made they poor and middle class pay taxes to them which in turn made the upper class wealthy. The poor suffered powerlessness because they were poor, therefore they were placed at the bottom of the social ladder.
The four groups were Brahim, Ksatriya, Vaisya, and Sudra. There was also another group, but they are considered not worth to be mentioned and they were the “untouchables.” The Brahim section of the caste system was the highest group of this class system. They were the priests or teachers of their Hindu religion. The Ksatriya were the warriors and rulers. The Vaisya were the farmers and merchants.
There was the main stretch between the wealthy or landowning class and the peasants, while in India it was a more intricate divisi. The gap caused most of the same problems and habits in each nation, though different in the details. The focus on agriculture created a huge working class, also referred to as peasants. Both societies were dependent on their peasants, although they didn’t always act like it. When one takes a deeper look into the workings of each culture, the specifics of religion and treatment vary widely.
‘Natural Law has no serious weaknesses.’ Discuss. The natural law theory is approach from an absolutist point of view which expresses that morality is set from birth. What is right and wrong, good or evil can be perceived almost instantly by everyone because morality is universal it is not a relativist thing that can change with situation. Also, natural law does not adjust to public opinion; it is an invisible measure which never changes. It can be seen as a good approach to morality as it does not allow people from different denominations such as cultures or where you are born or in different situation they may find themselves to build their own moral rules and framework to life, it is personal but is guided by these innate rules.
As one can see, more than half of their class structureswere the same Religion was an important part of life for the Maya, Aztec, and Inca. A distinctsimilarity was in which god was the most important. Both the Aztec and the Inca believed that the Sun God was the most important god. Although there was no clear god that was the most important in the Mayan society, as the primary gods wereforces or objects in nature that affected their daily lives, it can be assumed that theSun God was very important to the Mayans. In all three civilizations, priestsconducted rituals.
The Aztec worshiped Gods represented natural forces that were vital to their agricultural economy. (1). Although Aztec society had strict classes, a person’s status could change based on his or her contribution to society. The society was divided into different classes like for example the leader, the nobility, local rulers, military, priestly, artisans, and commoners. The ancient Maya, a diverse group of indigenous people who lived in parts of present-day Mexico, Belize, Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras, had one of the most sophisticated and complex civilizations in the Western Hemisphere.
Thus, families that had to turn over much of their produce to landlords relied on these girls to send money home. This document comes from an outside source, a Buddhist priest, though, which could affect its truthfulness. In Document nine, Indian workers are described as peasants and farmers who earned low wages and lived in small huts. The speaker of this document was from the British Commission of Labor in India, so it was probably very accurate, coming from a government source. In document five, it is explained that wages are low from the factories because the factory workers are unattached parts of their family and only need to earn enough money to support a single person, not a whole family.
Agriculture was what the whole village's economy was based on. Citizens consumed food produced by the peasant farmers whose wives would join in and help with the harvesting. It was crucial for farmers to realize when it was the right time to harvest. A small fraction of land was given to the peasant's from their lords in exchange for their demanding hours of labor. Regardless, there was a good chance of a peasant not having a sufficient amount of food if it rained alot, therefore the family would starve to
The only jobs that the Japanese could get at the time of WW2 were the “blue collar jobs,” they would work long and hard hours and be paid less than the other races there. They worked in mills, factories and farms. It’s a prime example of a dual labor market. As stated by the Webster Dictionary, it is a theory that divides the economy into two parts such as primary and secondary or superior and inferior. It means that there were jobs that were classified as superior jobs that paid more and high skill levels, and then there were the jobs that were the “blue collar” jobs with the lower level skills.
Standard employment relationships were considered "full-time continuous employment relationships where the worker has one employer, works on the employer's premises' under his or her direct supervision, normally in a unionized environment , and has access to social benefits and entitlements that complete the social wage" (Butchtemann and Quack, 1990: 315 cited in Vosko, 2006). However, the shift to non standard employment relationships are characterized by limited social and statutory benefits, as in not enough legal protection and limited access to welfare programs. Job insecurity, due to the constant need for capitalists to cut back on labour due to the burden of competition. Low wages also come into play, as the competition between workers may bring prices down, as well as the pressure put on capitalist to cut additional costs. Temporary and part-time work is also a big trend in post- Probably one highly exploitive factor is the high risk of health that these precarious jobs bring to workers.