Casey Anthony Trial

459 Words2 Pages
The covereage of the Casey Anthony trial has proven that justice is more difficult, and with over whelming evidence against her, should she be considered innocient or guilty? Or should her innocence be questioned? The media coverage of the Casey Anthony trial has defenitly made it harder to have a fair trial. In most cases the jury is usally choosen from the city the case is in, but in this case the jury was picked from another city. With the abundance amont of evidence against Casey, should she still be considered innocent until proven guilty? Caylee Marie Anthony born August 9, 2005 and died around June 2008 was a two year old little girl who was reported missing in Orlando, Florida, in July 2008, and whose remains were found in a wooded area near her home in December 2008. Caylee lived with her mother ,Casey and her grandparents, George and Cindy Anthony. Caylee was reported missing to 911 by Cindy, who said she had not seen Caylee for 31 days and that Casey’s car smelled like a dead body. She said Casey had given varied explanations as to Caylee’s whereabouts and finally amitted that she had not seen her daughter for weeks. Casey had told the police many different stories like her kid had been kidnapped by a nanny on June the 9th, and that she had been trying to find her whereabouts and she was too frightened to alert the police. With the child still missing , Casey was charged with first degree murder in October and pled not guilty. The little girl’s skeletal remains where then found December 11th in a wooded area near the family’s home. The investigation with the Orange County Sheriff’s Department began investigating the disappearance of Caylee Anthony , he found discrepancies in Casey’s signed statement. When questioned Casey said that Caylee had been kidnapped by Zenaida, who was identified as the nanny. Although Casey had talked the nanny, this

More about Casey Anthony Trial

Open Document