Carl demonstrated meager planning, implementation, and unwieldiness to follow-through with his assigned duties. It appears that Carl Robins is not qualified or trained properly to do his job successfully. This issue may have been averted by establishing a systematic leadership and mentoring plan by ABC, Inc. to train and advise their new employees. Several issues stand out immediately. New employees did not have the required forms completed and their transcripts were not on file.
When beginning the project, an Implementation plan was not made, and followed through. The change in leadership further effected the project success. The leadership that was chosen to finish caring out the project was not supportive, or inspiring of the team. This caused the development of the project to fail. The progress reports were not accurate, so rebuilding of the project was not
• They did not respond appropriately to allegations of abuse. • They did not have arrangements in place to protect the people against unlawful or excessive use of restraint. • They did not operate
No proper tracking and accounting of inventory is possible. Early payment discounts are also missed. The lack of documentation for the items picked up is not helping the departments to stay within budget. Corners are being cut with the way the system works. Two micrometers are lost because the expeditor most likely has picked up them up at the receiving dock and has taken them directly to the engineers.
There was a lack of proper supply -chain command. Unlike earlier, when DynaCorp was smaller, the manufacturing and engineering teams worked in symphony and harmony with each other. Now due to offices being separated across geographies there is a lack of communication between these teams. Another aspect is that new ideas were not reflected anywhere. This is due to the many layers of the organization.
WINTERBOURNE VIEW The review found that there was a systemic failure to protect people or to investigate allegations of abuse. The provider had failed in its duty to notify the C.Q.C(Quality Care Commission) of serious incidents involving injuries to patients, or occasions when they had gone missing. Inspectors said that staff did not appear to understand the needs of the people in their care, adults with learning disabilities , complex needs and challenging behaviour. Staff who had no background in care services had been recruited, references were not always checked and staff were not trained or supervised properly. Some staff were too ready to use methods of restraint without considering alternatives.
The workers were not visiting the clients on a weekly basis as mandated by DCFS and paperwork was consistently late. There was chronic absenteeism, a high level of turnover, low morale, and low job satisfaction among the employees. All of the above issues adversely affect the level of care and services being provided to the client. How can Hull House Association communicate change in an effort to increase employee satisfaction and organizational productivity? Hull House’s leadership was not supportive of staff at that time.
Enron will be an example of a dysfunctional company for many years to come. It was clearly a company riddled with fraud and excess and its conduct drove it into bankruptcy. The text argues that individual behavior was not at the core of Enron’s problems. What were the problems with this corporation from an organizational architecture point of view? The problem of this company was to leave low-level employees make decisions with little knowledge they needed more trained staff.
• Poor communication after Mr. Barton discontinued the tally system. ➢ Employees felt management failed to represent their best interests. ➢ Poor communication by management. There was a lack of input requested from sales personnel. Problem Statement The problem, in this case, stemmed from declining department sales and inappropriate business practices that created unpleasant work conditions and significant reductions in employee productivity.
Ethical Issue: Before even beginning the project, Mr. Allison couldn’t keep his commitment in regards to meeting the temperature requirement. Mr. Allison was dishonest and to make matters worse he failed to voice his concerns. It was apparent that Gary was not truly on board with the project plans from the beginning and lack confidence to get the job done. Everyone on the team also did not communicate these issues with the client or stakeholders of the organization. Legal and Contractual Issues: SEC is guilty of legal and contractual issues in regards to the Orion Shield Project.