Grand Canyon JUS 110 MOD 2 DQ 1 What types of crimes might be more susceptible to trait theory explanations such as hormonal influences? Why? Grand Canyon JUS 110 MOD 2 DQ 2 Should people
Different sociologists have presented different theories and concepts to explain what drives a person to commit a crime, and research and statistics give us an idea of the type of crimes committed and the places that they’re most likely to occur. However, these statistics can prove to be misleading as not all crime is reported to or recorded by the police. This can be referred to as the ‘hidden figure’, and it differentiates between the official crime rate and the real rate. Despite this, they do prove to be worthwhile in the fact that they display trends and patterns of crime. Sociologists use three different methods to measure crime; each method provides us with particular information and as in all systems of data collecting, there are strengths and weaknesses to the method.
Describe Using Evidence any two influences that explain why a person turns to crime. (15) There are various influences which may explain why a person tunes to crime, these influences may vary between a person’s upbringing, cognitive and biological make up. A study that supports this theory may be Farringdon et al. He suggest that social factors experienced during a child life and upbringing are clearly associated with criminal behaviour. Within the study he was able to identify patterns of particular behaviour and social factors which later lead to participants becoming’ chronic offenders’, examples of this situation were, poor parenting, harsh discipline, family members who were currently or previously offenders, and the child’s poor performance
For example the British crime survey (2007) found 90% of where the victim was white; at least one of the offenders was also white. However while victim surveys are useful in identifying ethnic patterns of offending, they have several limitations. They rely on a victim’s memory of events. Ben Bowling and Coretta Phillips (2002) found whites may over identify blacks, saying the offender was black even when not sure. They only cover personal crimes, which make up 20% of all
Symbolic interactionism first emerged in the 1930s and began to grow around the 1960s. Unlike conventional functionalist criminology who are methodologically positivistic and rely on the Official Crime statistics as social facts, Interactionists views OCS as a social construction compiled by the police, courts and Criminal Justice System. Interactionists take a micro approach when studying crime and deviance as they are particularly interested in the studying individuals in society the process of interaction to discover why certain groups are more susceptible to deviancy than others. The term labelling theory derives from Interactionism which argues that individuals are presented with different labels, some of which are stigmatized such as a delinquent. This is the work of Becker who argues “Deviancy is not a quality of the act a person commits but rather a consequence of the application by others of rules and sanctions to an ‘offender’.
It will address the relationship between distance from city center versus changes in land use, property values, transportation, and retail. Additionally, this paper will discuss whether or not zones of transition apply to Phoenix, identify criminal hot spots, and provide relevant data to support the answers. It will explain how the findings relate to socioeconomics and values. Finally, it will identify the rationale for the choice of one sociologic theory the best explains crime in the
My objective for this paper is to make use of criminologist theories to explain why these three individuals made the decisions to pursue a criminal career and what factors influenced them in following this path. Social Disorganization Theory Criminologists, look at many things when trying to negate what causes people to deviate from social and group norms with regards to their criminal behavior. It follows that sociologists have
First I would like to start by giving a brief definition of what or better said – how, criminology differs from victimology. Criminology is more concerned with the origin of crime along the extent and nature of crime. Criminology places an emphasis on studying the offender, the crimes, and the motives behind the crime. It is also the study of how the public and criminal justice system responds to the offender. Victimology plays a very important role in criminology and is used to determine what the victim’s behavior has to do with their risk of being victimized.
What were the Rates of Crime for each Area? Inglewood California has a lower aggravated assault crime rate than Knoxville Tennessee. In Inglewood California, the aggravated assault crime rate per 100,000 people in 2006 is 426.8. Knoxville Tennessee had an aggravated assault crime rate of 684.7 for every 100,000 people (Area Connect, 2014). The aggravated assault crime rate for 2006 is reported because it falls between the years 2000 and 2012 that are used in this report of crime data.
They claim that profiling is then not about race or ethnicity but about carrying out the most proficient fighting operations to target crime. They, therefore, argue that have been targeted by ethnicity or race is simply the regrettable cost of crime fighting that is effective. Therefore, the supporters of racial or ethnic profiling are under the assumption that the use of appearance based on race or ethnicity as one of the factors for targeting possible criminals in fact yields better results (Harris, 2002). However, in a study conducted by David Harris a Law Professor, these assumptions are faulty. First of all, as of the late 1990’s, no one in the law enforcement departments had bothered to test whether these assumptions had some truth to them.