They came to an apartment building where they smelled marijuana coming from one of the doors. After knocking and identifying themselves as the police, they heard noises that they described as shuffling as if to destroy evidence. Police then kicked the door in and entered the apartment. Upon entering the apartment, police found drugs in plain view. During another search, police found even more evidence.
Running head: SENTINEL EVENT ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS 1 Sentinel Event Root Cause Analysis Kalleen Campbell Accreditation Audit Task 2 April 20, 2013 SENTINEL EVENT ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS 2 SENTINEL EVENT ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS 1. Identification of Process This report was received regarding an event that requires investigation: The pre-op nurse told the mother that once Tina went to the OR, her surgery would take about 45 minutes and then she would go to recovery and she would be there at least one hour. The mother told the nurse that once Tina went to the OR, she needed to run a quick errand involving an older sibling and would return in time to pick her up once she got out of recovery. The mother gave the pre-op nurse her cell phone number with instructions to contact her if Tina got out of surgery sooner than expected. Tina’s mother returned to pick her approximately 2 ½ hours later and found that Tina was discharged 30 minutes earlier.
Fact Pattern: Joe Justice is a local county prosecutor in the state of Ohio. One day, Joe receives a law enforcement felony packet that details the investigation on suspects Slick Martin and Jim Lawbreaker. The police agency investigated their involvement in a robbery at a local grocery store. Based on the facts, Martin entered the store armed with a firearm. Lawbreaker waited in a car located in back of the store.
They had prior knowledge of several criminal acts that occurred on and near their property. Furthermore they were made aware of the parking lot light being out but because they did not have adequate inventory, the light bulb was not replaced. Statement of Facts At approximately 9:00 p.m., Victoria V., was sexually assaulted in the parking lot of U Shop Mall. She had arrived at the mall earlier during daylight hours. Knowing she would be leaving the mall after dark, she parked under a light.
On appeal, Michigan Court of Appeals reversed the motion to suppress. Soon after, Hudson was convicted of drug possession. Hudson then filed an appeal which brought the case to the Supreme Court. Provision of the constitution involved in this case: This case involves the exclusionary rule which comes directly from the Fifth Amendment. It states that no object may be used in court as evidence if obtained illegally or without a proper search warrant.
United States v. Donovan 250 F. Supp. 463 (1966) Facts: Donavan prepared tax returns for clients, after getting the money from them, he told the clients that he would transmit the money and the returns to the Internal Revenue Service. However, he failed to file the returns and make the payments of the money. Instead, he transferred the money to his own uses and told his clients that he had filed the returns and paid the taxes. Donavan is sued for failing to file tax return and pay tax under Internal Revenue Code Section 7201.
The patient knew this colleague worked at the hospital. Over the next six weeks, the patient noticed an increase in cancelations of appointments with his patients. The dentist called a few of his long term patients and they explained that though the sympathized with him, they no longer feel safe in his care. Within two months after, the dentist’s practice virtually collapsed. The colleague, who the dentist knew, signed an affidavit stating that the nurse’s aide in the radiology holding area called him the day of the biopsy and informed him of the dentist’s HIV status.
The man then ran away.Deputies responded to the store at on the report of an armed robbery. This is not my life, and these are not my habits. I do not even live in the Clapham Road. The trampling of the security guard "was such a tragic event and generated so much negative publicity not only about Walmart, but it raised questions about Black Friday in general," said Jie Zhang, an associate professor of marketing at the Robert H. School of Business at the University of
If your store policy is to detain and apprehend all shoplifters, then you must adhere strictly to this step. Experienced shoplifters will try to dump the concealed merchandise, without your knowledge, if they believe they have been observed. Many states have adopted merchant statutes to protect the retailer against this trick. If you followed steps 1-3 and then lost sight of the shoplifter for several minutes you may be surprised when you detain them and they are no longer holding your merchandise. The best approach, if you loose sight of a shoplifter, is to make your presence know to the shoplifter and give them a chance to dump your merchandise and leave your store without a word being said.
That same foundation has worked tirelessly to successfully ban smoking in all public places including bars, restaurants, workplaces, and even public streets. Their logic is that banning smoking will cleanse the air of impurities that smokers choose to ingest, but should not inflict onto others. The unfortunate truth is that not every business wants to place a ban on smoking. In the early 2000s when smoking bans in bars grew more rigid, the owners and managers of nightlife establishments complained that business took a sharp downward spiral as a result. People could no longer smoke in establishments that served food and customers did not want to come in for drinks, only to step outside whenever they wanted to smoke.