Carter Vs. Reagan Essay

1131 WordsNov 30, 20085 Pages
Throughout history, America has been lead by various leaders each having unique characteristics. Each personality touched various people among the different classes. Some leaders went down in history in a positive manner while others went into the history books leaving a legacy of disaster. Two unique presidents of the twentieth century included Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. Each person was unique and appealed to the American people in different ways. In comparison, Mr. Carter did not appeal to the masses of people like Mr. Reagan managed to do. Personality, experience, beliefs, policies, and how they related to others determined their popularity. James Earl Carter grew up to become a little-known former governor of Georgia. His peers considered him to be an outsider in the political arena. He expressed keen intelligence and dedication to duty. In comparison, Ronald Reagan grew up to become a well-known actor and a master of media, effective political speaker, governor of California, and proved to be a likeable and sensible leading man to average Americans. Their personal differences and accomplishments in their adult lives seemed to shape their popularity with the American public. From these descriptions it can be seen that Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan were two different people with different ideas. Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan had different political ideas. Jimmy Carter wanted to address the outdated portions in the original Panama Canal Treaty and replace the treaty to accommodate current issues. This new and improved treaty would slowly give possession of the canal from the United States to the Panamanians. His political opponents saw this as a give-away. Mr. Carter also appointed a young African American by the name of Andrew Young to serve as United States ambassador to the United Nations. His greatest political achievement was the creation of a

More about Carter Vs. Reagan Essay

Open Document