He explains that the death penalty is just an act of torture and is too horrible to be used by our civilized society, stating that it is “torture until death” (220). He goes on to argue that the death penalty is unjust in its practice because it is applied in arbitrary and also in discriminatory ways. Quoting, “Remain grants that the death penalty is a just punishment for some murderers, but he thinks that justice does not require the death penalty for murderers” (221). He goes on to say that life imprisonment can be an alternative decision that stratifies the requirements of the justice
Capital punishment does not deter crime; instead it increases the murder rate and there is a chance of error. Therefore, capital punishment should not exist in today’s society because it is an unconstitutional punishment. Capital punishment it’s not necessary and it is also unfair. There is a chance of error, you can execute the wrong person and later on find them innocent. Even though some may argue that death penalty deters crime, studies have shown that it does not.
Sparing the innocent victims who would be spared, ex hypothesi, by the nonexecution of murderers would be more important to me than the execution, however just, of murderers. But although there is a lively discussion of the subject, no serious evidence exists to support the hypothesis that executions produce a higher murder rate. Cf. Phillips, The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: New Evidence on an Old Controversy, 86 AM. J. SOC.
This inflexibility prevents the court from taking into account motive or circumstances, both of which can make a significant difference to the way in which society would view the individual offence. In R.v.Lichniak (2002) the defendants argued that the life sentence was disproportionate to the offence, in breach of article 3 of the European convention of the European Convention of Human Rights, an arbitrary, in breach of Article 5 of the convention. These arguments were rejected by the House of Lords. A further Criticism of Murder is that of the actual definition
Our justice system shows more sympathy for criminals than it does victims and this should be altered. It’s time we put the emphasis of our criminal justice system back on protecting the victim rather that the accused. We need justice for current and past victims, longer sentences and the death penalty is the way to achieve this. Death sentence provides a deterrent for prisoners already serving a life sentence. Nothing is to stop people who have been sentenced to life imprisonment to kill in prison; to escape and kill or to kill when their life sentence (minimum of 15 years) has been
Nationwide Display of Race Discrimination In essence, the death penalty is a punishment which is arbitrarily applied. There are no rules or guidelines for when a prosecutor should pursue the death penalty, when a jury should recommend it, and when a judge should order it. This lack of objective measurable standards ensures that the application of the death penalty will be discriminatory against racial, gender and ethnic groups. Racially biased decisions can easily enter the criminal justice system through the discretion given to prosecutors to selectively seek the death penalty in some cases but not others. The General Accountability Office (GAO), an independent nonpartisan agency review of race discrimination noted that “race of victim influence
Student Professor English 305 6 November 2009 I Say No To Hate Crime Laws Hate crimes are an irrational, ignorant and cowardly expression of desperation. A person who commits a hate crime is desperate to feel better, superior and in control. That being said, there should not be special laws and mandatory sentences for people who commit these heinous acts of violence because they do not accomplish the goals of eradicating or deterring bigotry. If we, as a society, put special laws and punishments into our legal system, we are unequivocally saying that the motive of these acts is more important than the intent or outcome of these crimes. I do not believe this is true nor do I feel that this is the position of the majority of people in
Why the United States should continue to use Capital Punishment Amie King Axia University of Phoenix There are several reasons I think the United States should keep using Capital Punishment. One of the reasons I think the United States should continue using Capital Punishment because I do not think it is right to keep rapists and murderers alive. I feel that if a person believes that another human beings life is not worth anything, then that person should not get the freedom to live for free, having everything paid for by the taxes of the person they killed, or raped. Another reason I believe that Capital Punishment should be allowed is that I feel murders are may be in prison for their crime, but being in prison, is like living
But I believe murder demonstrates a lack of respect for human life. Because life is precious and death is irreversible, I believe that a policy giving the state autorotation to kill is immoral. It epitomizes the tragic inefficacy and brutality of
Judge Marvin Arrington, a black judge in Atlanta, confirms that in Atlanta, African-Americans are 54 percent of the population, but are responsible for 100 percent of homicide, 95 percent of rape, 94 percent of robbery, 84 percent of aggravated assault, and 93 percent of burglary. Source: APD Uniform Crime Reports, Apr 2011 to Apr 2012. The real problem is the moral structure deterioration so prevalent around the country, not the skin pigmentation of our citizens. It is sad that more of our black citizens are not more upset about the realities of these statistics as the black citizens seem to be suffering the most acutely as