Although, she does admit even she was shocked when listening to the speech, as she explains “the line was not believable”. From this I can conclude that source one doesn’t wholly hold Churchill responsible for the 1945 election defeat, however the reliability of the source is questionable as it is bias towards the conservative party. Source two, an extract from Lord Butler’s memoirs, clearly shows opposition to not only Churchill but also the conservative party, Lord Butler for example describes Churchill’s speech as a “negative attack on the labour party” and believed that he should have instead focused on “post-war policies”. By describing Churchill’s use of the word “Gestapo” as a “strategic blunder” shows that Butler is blaming Churchill in having played a role in the defeat of the 1945 election. Although both members of the conservative party, Butler and Churchill were political enemies, this is evident when looking at the extract: “a poor third place to the concentrated exploitation of Churchill’s personality” – this is a personal attack on Churchill’s actions.
When Keynes rejected the scale of reparations placed on Germany and resigned from his post at the Treasury, he lead the way for what many leading politicians were to understand later on. Keynes supported the approach of Lloyd George that for economic and political reasons, Europe needed a successful Germany, which would be seriously difficult to achieve whilst the excessive reparations were placed on them. Furthermore, his book The Economic Consequences of the Peace (1919), was successful in influencing the view of Britain that a weak Germany would only make the recovery of Europe after the war, a lot more difficult. On the other hand, from taking this view, politicians were criticised for being 'too lenient' towards Germany. Even Lloyd George, who took a much tougher political approach towards the reparations, received criticism.
I especially enjoyed his analysis on the vigilantes and in particular the American Protective League (APL) which is a fairly significant picture of the state of affairs within our country and moreover, the lack of control the government had against the people. The “conspiracy theorist” inside of me has always believed in false flag terror, citizen spies and inside jobs and the existence of the APL was complete confirmation for me. While most would argue that these types of organizations couldn’t exist today, Kennedy opens the door to this type of behavior, which seems illegal in its very fibers. As discussed last week, this time period was rich with reform and political parties were eager to trump the other in any way possible. In Over Here, Kennedy touches on the elites pulling the strings behind the scenes spreading political influence and propaganda along the way.
The documentary ends with President Clinton in office for 1992, which caused the shift of balance of power in favor of the Democrats. However, the Republicans turned to a majority position in both houses of Congress in the Election of 1994. Ken Burns' "The Congress" is a wonderful history of an essential but underrated American institution. In only one hundred minutes, Burns captures the strengths and weaknesses of our legislative branch like few documentarians could. Congress, often accused of gridlock and pork barreling, actually exemplifies the American
Some of the current sources of stress for the criminal justice professional are, long hours and not enough family time with loved ones. I do believe that the agencies provide adequate assistance with managing occupational stressors; they are just not explored and used enough by the individuals that need them. I believe the politics of corruption exists within the field of criminal justice. I say that because it seems that if you are wealthy strings can be pulled for you and u can afford the best lawyers, and u could be guilty but you will get off because you or your family are well off. On the other hand there that middle class of poor that knows nothing about the system or doesn’t have the resources to get a good lawyer they are screwed completely ruin your life and affecting some people around you.
Long, long ago throughout Europe and parts of Asia, Communism was thought to be an excellent way of life. Maybe it was too much of a Utopian thought to actually follow through with. In Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” he says, “If I lived in a *Communist country today where certain principles dear to the Christian faith are *suppressed, I believe I would openly *advocate *disobeying these anti-religious laws.” I strongly believe that Doctor King not only brought up Communism because of Hitler’s Germany in the nineteen forties, but also because Communism was thought up to be as every single person were to be equal. There would be no such thing as social classes, or rich and poor, or black or white; everyone would be equal.
In an attempt to make a name for himself, Coughlin set up the National Union for Justice and bashed Roosevelt, claiming he was “anti-God". Coughlin wanted what he described as a "fair wage" to be paid to those who were less well off. During this strive, Coughlin partnered up with Frances Townsend who opposed the New Deal as well. Townsend argued that the federal government should give citizens aged 60 and above $200 a month to be financed by a 2% sales tax. After Huey Long’s death, these 2 men teamed themselves up with one of his loyal followers, Gerald Smith, and these three men planned to reach out to the less fortunate of America in hopes of rallying a group large enough to enact
The limited nature of the revolution was one of the main factors which weakened prospects for democracy, when Ebert was trying to form a government he still had a problem that the radical communists were still looking to turn Germany into a communist state similar to the Soviet Union and thus to put down this rebellion and get support of the army he made an agreement with Groener. The agreement was that the army would support the government if the army and civil service were left unchanged. This was the main reason that democracy was irreversibly weakened, because the civil service and army generals were all right-wing conservatives providing a powerbase for the radical right. This limited democracy because the radical right thought that democracy was weak and indecisive, the radical right though was weakened because the radical left was way more powerful initially in post war Germany, but the radical right would help democracy until the radical left was no longer a threat and would act as ticking time bomb of support. This could have acted as a powerbase for the Kapp Putsch and the eventual rise of the Nazis.
In Gesellshaft, the relations between members of a community are naturally more detached and impersonal, and people are highly concerned with the interest of themselves. Industrial organizations and bureaucracies dominate social roles, as personal relationships become limited to direct tasks, such as making a purchase from a local store. This directly impacts the necessary changes in social life and shifts between generations. Due to the lack of social ties, one’s behavior must rely on methods and laws formally set by their government. The differences between Gemeinschaft and Gesellshaft are evident.
The anti-Communist Right of the Party bitterly opposed the conspiracy theory that Evatt mounted at the Petrov Royal Commission. They believed... Neglecting Crimes Of The Powerful: The Construction Of Public Ambiguity factors in the construction of ambiguity creates the risk of being associated with conspiracy theory. In a British Society of Criminology article, entitled Behind... Goldman Sachs: History & Evolution This leads Goldman to have an undue influence in the political sphere and conspiracy theories abound on how Goldman let Lehman slide for its own sins. However, it... Gangsterism to serve the interests of the Western powers.