Business and Social Responsibility Essay

587 Words3 Pages
Companies’ Attitudes Towards Social Responsibility Companies’ Attitudes Towards Social Responsibility Social responsibility varies in meaning from one organization to another because organizations have different interpretations of the term. However, Ruschak (2013) claims that the different definitions of social responsibility support the improvement of relationships between different stakeholders and a balance between profit, the planet, and the people. However, there are organizations that have not embraced social responsibility as demonstrated by the case of company Q. The case involving Company Q is characterized by its laxity to donate its day-old goods to a local food bank as part of social responsibility. Company Q has a reactive attitude towards social responsibility. According to Ruschak (2013), when a company denies and ignores activities for social responsibility, its attitude is reactive. Company Q is a local grocery store and the main expectation from members of the community is that the company would act in a manner that is responsive to the need for donations at the area food bank. The company serves a local community and part of its social responsibility activities should ensure that the needs of the community are met and the environment is conserved, even as the company seeks to make profit. The reactive attitude in this case indicates indifference and ill will because the company wishes to maximize its profits without engaging in any form of social responsibility activities that would benefit the community and the environment. To improve the company’s attitudes from reactive to proactive as suggested by Ruschak (2013), a number of steps can be taken. First, the managers of Company Q should value social responsibility as suggested by Ruschak (2013). This will improve the company’s support for social responsibility
Open Document