2. You should never 'wing it' before going to court, leaving you to go to court unprepared. The court will need specific, detailed information about the case. Your credibility as a witness will be enhanced if you have reviewed your case file and have a good understanding of what the case is about and what work you’ve done on it. 3.
This aspect will make the victim more confident hence tell the whole story. * Avoid asking to many unnecessary questions as this may frustrate the victim if they end up thinking that they are not believed. Record any questions you ask. * The victim may want confidentiality about the abuse. Always ask what the victim wants to happen and never make promises you can’t keep.
If properly executed with an actual resister, pulling this lever can positively influence adoption of the initiative by the resister and his or her friends. We highly believe not to do this decision because we tried two times in the first round and received the unsatisfied result that the person confronted as a resister was upset and unconvinced by our discussion. Moreover, we have lost credibility and now some employees are less enthusiastic about the change initiative. Hence we deem that the person who has strict different thought with us is hard to confront, therefore, we did not take this decision in the second
Yet I would not expect someone that isn’t as close to me to immediately grasp what it is I am trying to get across. Taking the description and details out only because it is someone close to me puts a strain on our relationship at times. My frustration and annoyance that I am still being asked to help when I briefly stated I wanted me to take over starts an argument. Being clear in communication could avoid future arguments. After reading this article I see that no matter how long you know someone or how close you are to them the communication needs to be clear.
This then moves to him coming to a swift and perhaps hasty conclusion without taking in all the evidence at the end of Act 1. Then through Act 2 we see Hales doubts grow as he realises he may be guilty of making rushed and thus poor decisions and the court’s accusations may be unjust. Not long after he first arrives in Salem, Reverend Hale’s words tell the audience a bit about his character and mentality. When Hale says ‘I shall not proceed unless you are prepared to believe me if I should find no bruise of hell upon her’ he is shown to be self-confident and unbiased. Despite all the opinions and views that are being aired, Hale is not swayed and announces that he will be the judge of whether there is witchcraft in Salem or not.
Gladwell stated what he wanted the readers to get out from his book and what we were expecting. Also, while at the same time Gladwell is persuading the readers to think the way he does. When I read this passage, my first initial thoughts were that learning how to control my judgments and first impressions is impossible. To me the statement, “be in control of your judgments” means the same as the statement, “I have control of my own heart beat,” which is impossible. My judgments are my own and it’s unique.
As a result, the key for the survival of individuality lies in how conformist the people are ready and willing to become. Freedom of imagination and speech is a double edged sword: if an individual freely chooses to believe everything he is told, be it out of conformism, lack of education or both, eventually he no longer possesses individual freedom. If this becomes common norm, it is easy for social organization to become exploited, corrupted and eventually regimented. Thus, an individual must be taught to question everything he sees or reads and never take anything for granted. Despite what captain Beatty says, it is certainly better to be free and melancholic than oppressed and
He decides that he is going to live his life by believing that he has no hands or eyes or senses, but that he just always believed that he had these things. By looking at things through this train of thought, he will protect himself from accepting any false beliefs to be true, ending the deceivers game of illusionist trickery. He is willing to accept this task although he is aware of how hard it is going to be to steer away from his former habitual opinions. It is evident that by the beginning of the second meditation Descartes has found himself shaken out of his comfort zone. Considering that he has decided to regard everything around him as false and an illusion concocted by this powerful demon, he is just left stuck in the middle of absolutely nothing.
The teachers also should have stepped in when they saw the fight happening and not just stood there. It teaches us students that we should stand up for kids, and teachers are not always the good person in the situation and there could be favoring. In conclusion, I think that The Chocolate War was a very good book that taught very interesting lessons. It always makes me think twice but saying, “no” to something that I should do. I think the lesson here is to just plain out respect everyone and you will not have any problems.
During the interview it is very important to build good rapport and listen very carefully. The last thing to do in an interview is access the accuracy of the statement given. There is always the possibility of over exaggeration or false reporting. So no matter what there will always need to be a full investigation of the crime, even if the person is telling the truth or lying. Never treat the person as a liar if you feel