Buddhism, Ascetic vs. Devotional

1686 Words7 Pages
Buddhism: Devotional versus Ascetic Texts, especially religious ones, are always written with a purpose. While this intention is at times more disguised than others, it is nevertheless undoubtedly present. Buddhism, like many other religions, embodies several aspects of performance and spiritual understanding. Its multifarious messages and teachings are often rather obscure and complex. In an effort to clarify and provide examples of such principles, various stories and tales were put into writing. However, it is not sufficient to simply examine the anecdote’s surface. To truly appreciate its value and comprehend its tenets, one needs to delve deeper than the superficial plot and characters the tale introduce, for there is much more to a story than what’s on the page. “Samaññaphala Sutta: The Fruits of the Homeless Life” and “The Perfection of Wisdom in Eight Thousand Lines” are perfect examples of how texts can highlight an array of Buddhist ideals and practices. While the former emphasizes a more ascetic, private, independent performance involving emotional detachment and withdrawal, the latter leans more towards a group-based, multilateral practice with a strong sense of generosity, involving a more public depiction of suffering as a driving force of the path to enlightenment. Our first story, “Samaññaphala Sutta” tells the tale of King Ajatasattu and his quest to discover the “fruit of the homeless life” (93). He goes on a journey to meet a Buddha, in hope to receive a plausible answer to his question. Upon encounter, the King describes his previous meetings with gurus as unsatisfying, unconvincing and irrelevant. Determined to find peace of heart and settle his confusion, the King has come to the all-knowing, enlightened Buddha who finally defines the true rewards of asceticism. The second tale is of Bodhisattva Sadaprarudita’s expedition and pursuit of the
Open Document