Not only did they westernized their education with modern sciences and modern life, but they also made a frame for the to establish laws and courts of justice (Document3). The British built a strong and efficient administration ran the government for the Indians, deciding that they would not be able to run their government properly, became a problem later for India. Imperialism may have been a positive force for India in many ways, but the economic gain benefitted
DBQ 17 British imperialism in the 19th and 20th centuries resulted in negative and positive effects on India and Britain itself. The British were positively affected by imperialism, while India was both positively and negatively affected by the imperialism. Indian natives had no say in government, and were pretty much ruled over, but were also positively affected, like adopting a parliamentary system of government. Britain was positively affected and gained mass amounts of natural resources and processed them, also known as mercantilism. There were many positive affects to Imperialism in India.
How successful was Edward IV management of the Royal Finances? Edward IV inherited the throne from Henry VI who had left the Crown in serious debt, therefore it was up to Ed to right this by earning not only enough to run the country, but also to pay back the debt. Furthermore a medieval king was expected to “live of their own” which meant that they should be able to afford the running of the country through their own lands and not need to ask parliament for tax which leads onto my next point in which the king should not rely on Parliamentary grants too much. I think that to a large extent, Ed was successful in managing the Royal Finances because I think that he fulfilled all of the criteria. Firstly, he was successful in managing the royal finances by innovatively using the Royal Chamber to efficiently manage the royal income.
This influence disregarded and ignored the Indian’s customs, traditions and culture which led to the resentment of the British. One of the initial goals of the British was to create a population that spoke the same language at their ruler – English. This did not go over well with the people of India and led to the Indian resentment of British imperialism. Although India was very much multi-lingual, the English language was spoken mainly by the more educated Indians who belonged to a more advantaged and privileged caste. The individuals in this caste were considered the most significant people in terms of nationalist thoughts and ideas (Aggarwal, 2013).
Stabilized traditional countries by uniting rival people. Communication was a result along with new schools and hospitals. The cons of western imperialism were the World Wars were caused by imperialistic ideas. Competition raged the tension between nations. Heavy taxes on the smaller countries disrupted local economies.
Simply put the policy worked on the theme with more money, a country has more power. The English colonists lost a lot of their money to the England and the monarchy because of the mercantilism policy. It was bad deal all the way around since the colonists sold their raw materials to the mother country at ridiculously low prices and bought back the finished products at exceedingly high prices because they could not complete the finished product. The second part of the policy was that a nation must regulate its trade to sell more than it buys. This ultimately brought the Navigation
In addition to helping India, the British Empire negatively affected India. According to Monhandas Ghandi’s speech in Document 7, the British impoverished India by controlling the Indian government. Year by year Britain stole India’s money. The British destroyed India’s spirit, and disregarded their feelings. India wasn’t the only country that Britain negatively affected.
Nina Phan 01/17/13 Period 2 British imperialism in India had many positive and negative effects on the mother country, Britain, and the colony, India. Many people argued about which effects were more important while some agreed that they were both equal. According to O.P. Austin, the benefits of the British imperialism were building roads, canals, railways, and telegraphs. They would be able to establish schools and newspapers for the people of the colonies.
European nations began by establishing colonies in foreign areas to gain access to new resources that could not be easily accessed in Europe. These colonies were established in places such as India, and Africa which were fertile growing areas for spices and other raw materials that are not able to grow in the northern colder climates of Europe. With the establishment of these colonies, the rulers of the European nations such as England, France, and Germany saw a great way to make some extra money in the form of taxation. I believe that this led ultimately to the idea of Imperialism in which these nations were heavily taxing these colonies. This in turn led to things such as the American Revolution and the commonly known phrase “taxation without representation”.
It was not until the British took over India that these ways of life were challenged with very dramatic changes. In this research paper, one will see that the caste system, favoured by the elite classes, was a very controlling hierarchy that confined people in a never ending cycle that was impossible to break free from. However, with the presence of outside British influence and innovations such as progressive and modern education, the development of economic and urban centers, and the banning of particular practices, the peoples who were oppressed by the caste system were empowered to break free from the constricting aspects of caste and work towards a better quality of life. The caste system is a very stable form of social hierarchy; it is steeped in ancient and strict traditions which enforce the roles of different caste members in a very harmonious society. Over the course of India’s long history, caste has been successful in maintaining social order, despite the many wars that have occurred between local