Exemplification Essay Banning Pit Bulls is wrong There is a lot of controversy about the Pit Bull breed and whether or not they should be banned in certain cities. I completely understand the fear that many people may have concerning these dogs. For these dogs are very strong and powerful by nature. Amongst all the controversy about the Pit Bull breed and whether or not they should be banned, I have formed my own educated opinion: Pit Bulls should not be banned. Why should we punish the dogs for the way they are being raised and trained?
Of course we hear stories of pit bulls attacking people, but the same is true of all other breeds. When a dog of some other breed attacks someone it does not draw much media attention, but when it's a pit bull it's all over the news. This gives the public a false sense of security because it makes us forget about other dogs from different breeds that have a attacked and hurt people. B. This leads me to my topic, should pit bulls be banned?
Last time I gave you an informative speech about the American Pit bull Terrier, gave you the history, physical characteristics and the shocking rates they are being put down to sleep. III. This time I will further the education of the Pit bull but show you both sides of an advocate of the pit bull and opponent determining if they should be legal or illegal. IV. The main issue here is if they are safe or not, and if they were former dog fighter should they deserve a second chance or do they pose a threat that they have to be euthanized.
What is Breed-Specific Legislation, you may ask? Breed-Specific Legislation, more commonly known as BSL, is a regulation that is directed towards one or more specific breeds or dogs (Welss 2001). Many have argued that BSL is taking away their Constitutional rights and freedoms; but do dogs have the same rights and freedoms as people? Animal lovers and owners of Pit Bulls and other dogs affected by BSL would tell us yes that we are taking away from their rights and freedoms and that this is racial profiling against these animals. Others that are pro-BSL and/or have been strongly affected by these dangerous dogs say that there is not enough done to keep the general public safe from these vicious animals and that there needs to be harsher laws.
Thesis The American Pit bull used to be viewed as Americas dog, but now many people have taken to the fear of this amazing breed, and this fear has lead to heart break for many pit bull lovers. There are just small things we can do to change the view of these dogs. Ethos Dogs are loved for their loyalty, variety, and abilities. Pit bulls are the greatest examples of these qualities, yet they are still the most feared and misunderstood dog breed. Pre-summary Seen as monsters because... Seen as pets because...
They advocated dealing with the epidemic by instituting a combination of animal control ordinances and educational efforts, as well as more accurate reporting of dog attacks. They opposed breed bans on the ground that any dog could be a bad dog, that it is too difficult to identify breeds like pit bulls, and that people with bad intentions will turn harmless breeds into killer breeds to stay one step ahead of the law. Other organizations that exist specifically to oppose breed bans and, in particular, pit bull bans, also promote stiff criminal laws against people who abuse dogs or habitually violate the animal control laws. See, for example, the "Three Strikes You're Out" proposal by Animal Farm Foundation, Inc., an organization devoted "to restore the image of the American Pit Bull Terrier, and to protect him from discrimination and cruelty" (the quote is from their home
This type of breed of dogs have a great deal of strength and muscle mass. Therefore, it is common for the owners to raise their dog to be unfriendly or aggressive. Many owners create their dogs personality to be aggressive for either using them for dog fights that wins money (like gambling) or for property protection. I wanted to join this study to provide information about my loving pitbull. Starting off with the questionnaire, it asks to select the breed of dog.
Pit bulls may attack often, but this may just be because they are trained to do so. People buy pit bulls because they want tough dogs that can attack and be violent, so the dogs are trained in a manner that promotes this. However, this quality is not inherent. If pit bulls were banned, dog owners who wanted dogs that could fight would just train another dog breed such as german shepherds to do the same thing. Therefore, banning pit bulls would make no progress.
The publisher just persuaded viewers through the messages that are directly shown on top of the background of cute dogs. However, they are tied by ropes or put in the cages. “Why do people continue to abuse and mishandle something that needs to be loved?” This message in the video is significance because it’s telling the truth about animal negligence. The publisher is calling everyone to “stop the abuse” and asking us to “act
Dog Owner vs. Compelling Advocate After reading “Letter from an Irate Dog Owner” and Al Knight's article”Perhaps We Should Move To Save Dogs From Their Owners” which argue opposing sides on whether a law should be passed to prohibit pickup owners from driving down major highways in Colorado with dogs in their truck beds. I feel that Al Knight's article which argues the law should be passed is a much more effective argument than that of the Irate Dog Owner who is against the law being passed. Both Al Knight and the Irate Dog Owner give reasons why their argument is correct but, the manner they use to get their point across is very different. Knights style of writing is formal, informative, and, stays in third person throughout his article.