Bp Amoco Case

915 Words4 Pages
“The Harmonized Savings Plan at BP Amoco” (i) Compare the retirement plan offerings of BP America (prior to the merger) and Amoco and briefly summarize the differences [3 pt] Amoco’s plan emphasizes a low-cost, passive, focused approach and uses index funds with low expenses across key investment classes and styles - domestic bonds, large-cap, mid-cap, and small-cap, international equities, money market, plus a balanced fund, US Savings Bonds, and Amoco stock. Ex post allocation by employees includes 56% company stock, 19% S&P500, and 17% money market. BP’s options included company stock, a stable income fund, and a few mostly actively managed US and international stock mutual funds, plus two balanced funds. Employees allocated 51% stable income, 16% company ADRs, 15% equity fund, and 11% balanced fund. BP recently added 150 Fidelity mutual funds. BP’s approach favors active funds, with a recent emphasis on flexibility of choices. (ii) What investment options would you advise BP Amoco to offer its employees as part of the retirement plan? Also discuss the inclusion of company stock on the list of investment alternatives [4 pt] How many investment options? BP has recently added numerous active funds. The default option is to combine the two plans. Pros: more room to construct a less constrained optimal portfolio. Keeping all active options on the list reduces the need to reallocate existing positions. Amoco offers few options. Pros: lower plan expenses; behavioral plan participants may be confused by too many choices. Active or passive? An average active fund has a negative net alpha, so a few passive funds spanning major asset classes will work just as well, and at a lower cost. However, having a range of active funds gives employees more flexibility to look for alpha and attempt to beat the market. Asset classes? Currently, equities, bonds, and cash.

More about Bp Amoco Case

Open Document