* A summary of your viewpoint and your understanding of the issue. * A point-by-point discussion of both strengths and limitations of your position, arguing overall that yours is superior. * A conclusion that drives home your thesis and looks to the future. 2. To identify points of contention first identify major
The order of the main points/argument in the body must follow the order of the main points/argument in the thesis statement. II. Body A. [Main point /Argument] 1. [Researched info] (parenthetical information: author’s last name # or “Article title”).
Write a ‘Response’: Respond to the writer’s IDEAS (main idea, first) by evaluating them and pointing out whether or not you agree with any of them. By responding to the writer’s ideas you will
| | |To show or demonstrate something|Order of importance is used with illustration|-Use evidence that is | |Illustration |clearly. It plainly demonstrates|essays. You can start supporting your main |appropriate to your topic as | | |and supports a point through the|point with your strongest evidence first, or |well as appropriate for your | | |use of evidence. |you can start
The Rhetorical Triangle Sunderman/1A Three important elements come into play when creating any kind of argument. These are illustrated by the rhetorical triangle: Logos (Message) Argument or Media Ethos (Author) Pathos (Audience) Logos: Rational or Logical Appeals. Appeal to logical reasoning ability of the audience through use of facts, case studies, statistics, experiments, logical reasoning, analogies, anecdotes, authority voices, etc. Are writer’s claims reasonable? Is there sufficient evidence to support those claims?
3: Supporting Claims: Appealing to Ethos, Pathos, and Logos; Graff’s, “Hidden Intellectualism” in TSIS pp. 198-205. Due: RR#2: Identify Graff’s argument and analyze how he supports it with ethos, pathos, and logos appeals. 3 9/9 Discourse Community Analysis Read: DCA Assignment in FYW pp. xxiv-xxvii, SFW pp.
Teams can use the 4Rs Method to analyze the conflict logically, which will lead to finding an appropriate approach to solving issues at hand. After analyzing the problem teams can chose between several approaches, which include the A-E-I-O-U Model, negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. The A-E-I-O-U Model is based on specific steps that help group members reach a consensus decision. Furthermore, group members’ concerns are taken into consideration and understanding them is mandatory in finding a viable solution. The steps in the A-E-I-O-U Model include: a) assume that the other members mean well; b) express one’s feelings; c) identify what one would like to have happen; d) outcomes one expects are made clear; and e) understanding on a mutual basis is achieved.
Choose one letter or editorial from the set provided. First, summarize the argument presented. Then, analyze and evaluate the argument presented. Be sure to identify the premises and conclusion(s) in the letter/editorial. In your response, consider how well the writer argues his or her point, whether the premises of the argument are warranted (believable); and whether or not the writer has included all the relevant information.
Week 2 peer review Argumentation rough draft 1. Does the introduction make clear what the issue the argument is about? If so what? 2. Does the introduction make clear the positions of the two-sided on the issue?
2. Provide important data from both sides relating to your topic. 3. Provide the pros and cons regarding your topic. II.