Books: Are they a thing of the past?
Good morning, my name is............, and I’ll talk about Books: Are they a think of the past?
I don't think books are a thing of the past. They may take different forms such as electronic readers, downloads from the internet, speakable text, etc. But the basic purpose of a book is to include some kind of in depth knowledge about a subject. Contrary to popular belief, we cannot receive all of the information we need on complex subjects through yahoo, book summaries, and other forms of condensed information, For example, a complex subject like the origin of the cosmos is such a large field that scientists need books in order to evaluate not only the information, but also the methods by which the information was collected. Students need to read longer fictional works because many characters and ideas cannot be fully developed in short stories. Films based on novels always need to leave something out in order to work on screen. In future generations, a book may come in some other form that paper that is bound together, but there will still need to be material that is published in some way to provide in depth knowledge.
Books cannot be replaced. Even when we down load material from internet we create the hard copy in the form of a book to read and reread again. You cannot replace the Bible and put on the internet.
To understand different shades of meaning and sublime delicate thought books should be studied with almost care and attention. A writer tries to put across his experience thought and imagination, creative abilities in the form of a book or a poem to make the reader to go through the same experience in totality. The writer clothes his thoughts in beautiful attire in the form rhythm rhyme and imagery. Such works can be appreciated only in the form of books.
Books are not a thing of the past, but paper might be soon though. And while it feels a shame to stop having these lovely tactile objects in our...