In Seaman's essay "How Bingeing Became the New College Sport," the author addresses the problem of pre gaming and the major effects of the legal limit for alcohol. * Topic: How bingeing became the new college sport Claim: And why it would stop if we lowered the drinking age. The author’s point of view is that “I’ve been there I know what happened because I know what I did”. He thinks that they should lower the drinking age because it will take away the excitement. Pre gaming is when college students gather in dorm rooms or apartments and drink as much alcohol before heading to parties or clubs.
Lowering the drinking age, I feel would be the best solution to solving the underground drinking problem, it would allow for drinking to be more “open.” Having the drinking age at 21 allows for there to me more difficulty in keeping track of the kids who use it because they do it secretly and tend to abuse it more. If the drinking age was lowered across the world, I think there would less binge drinking amongst the teens and would allow for the elders to have more control over the consumption of alcohol. Drinking at any age under 18 should not be allowed but once you turn 18 you should be allowed to drink legally. When one turns 18 they assume adult penalties, are allowed to vote, die for their country, and even get married. So why can’t they enjoy a few beers legally?
Eighteen-year-olds can run for public office, vote, serve in the military and get married. So, the lower-drinking-age question has to be considered in the context of all those other decisions," Jordan said. "My concern and that of many of the other presidents who signed the initiative is that we aren't doing our students a favor by avoiding this. Saying that keeping the minimum age at 21 is reducing highway deaths is ignoring the bigger problem." Dr. George
He goes on to say in the second misperception, “college graduates are finding it harder to get good jobs with liberal arts degrees”, but “the recession has no differentiated among major fields of study in its impact” (192). Ungar believes students who focus on one particular field of study do not learn necessities such as writing and literary texts, and this puts them at a disadvantage when compared to a liberal arts graduate. While long-standing jobs, such as doctors and lawyers, will not become extinct soon, liberal arts graduates have a better chance of employment in most areas. 95% of employers surveyed would give hiring preference to graduates with skills to contribute in the workplace. 74% would recommend a liberal arts education to a young person they know today, so they will be prepared for success in today’s global economy.
And above all else, money for instance, it seems to make them healthier and happier. The first of the anti-college arguments to be explored is the ever so misleading financial burden, the money. Leonhardt give two main reasons why the increasing student debt and startling tuition costs aren’t normally a problem for graduating students. First off, once you look into college tuition rates and any financial aid is taken into account, average fees and tuition were only about $2,000 at public four-year colleges(647). His next big point
Is College Debt Worth It? We all grow up being exposed to the thought of college being full of parties, drinking, and a whole lot of sex. As a college student, I can attest that the exposure we’ve experienced is true, but there is one thing that the media has failed to mention: College debt is real and obtaining a degree doesn’t mean you’ll have employers throwing copious amounts of money at you. In the article “Debt Education: Bad for the Young, Bad for America”, written by Jeffrey J. Williams, data shows that tuition has increased at roughly three times the rate of inflation. Inflation aside, this means college is getting more expensive.
Drinking Age I believe if we lowered the drinking age it will make alcohol less of a taboo, and make alcohol consumption a more normalized activity done in moderation. In this opinion paper I will be talking about the drinking age which should be lowered. I will also include some interesting facts about drinking. I think the drinking age should be lowered because of a lot of things. Some of those things are that in 1970 through 1975 they previously lowered the drinking age down to 18, because that’s when you enter adult hood, you should be responsible for your actions.
Dear Honorable Titian: I understand the House of Representatives of the United States has just passed a bill which would do away with federal grants to college students. I am currently enrolled in college and depend greatly on the grants I receive. These grants allow great opportunity, for not just me, but for many other students as well. Taking them away would cause problems in several areas. The passage of the “Pick the Public’s Pocket No More” bill would lower college application rates, lower college graduation rates, and lower our country’s number of new college graduates for open positions in the work force.
If the age is lowered, young adults won't binge as often making it safer and not something that's done to be “cool”. Learning how to drink at a younger age allows responsibilities to be taught before kids are sent to college. Lowering the high drinking age in the United States will reduce the irresponsible drinking habits amongst the youth in America.
Because of this phenomenon, Heineken wishes to reposition their flagship brand as a younger, trendier beer and capture more of the 21 to 30 year old beer-consuming market. To achieve this goal, Heineken has hired Group 1 to conduct research on this target market and determine why college students buy beer. By defining the construct of a beer purchase and conducting qualitative and quantitative research Group 1 can help Heineken to reposition their brand to better suit a trend toward young, college-aged drinkers. Problem Definition Heineken has traditionally always been a beer for a mature demographic (Schmutt 2010); but recently, many of Heineken’s main competitors have begun to market their mature brands to a younger audience. Heineken too wants to capitalize on this growing trend of young (21-30 year old) drinkers, but lacks the research capabilities to carry out this task.