By doing this, Len became the dominant party. By Len acting like this, it made Marilyn to fail with the negotiation because she couldn’t handle the equal party and did not get ideas or points effectively across. Were Len's objectives on the way to being effectuated in the first exchange? With Len’s attitude, we can see that he will be able to meet his goals in this negotiation process. Because Len is more aggressive when it comes to negotiation, Marilyn feels now that she cannot across her points.
This book was not very good. I think someone older might like it better than a middle schooler. The characters were pretty well throughout the book. They were like a real family, fighting with each other. I do not, however, think that’s a normal family in that time period.
This has been given a lot of criticism over the years as many other countries, not only the United States, have also now switched to codified constitution although the UK has failed to evolve. The reason a codified constitution has an advantage over this system of an uncodified constitution and also outweighs its disadvantages is because it doesn’t have as many risks and is a lot more stable. This is because codified constitutions can’t be changed by parliament and the government if they suddenly feel like changing it for their own benefit, so if a law is put in to place to protect people’s rights or stop the government from overpowering then it could be very much be changed or modified which could lead to more problems in the future. On the other hand, the fact that a codified constitution can not be adapted is also one of its biggest disadvantages. Since a codified constitution is already written, over years this could become a problem.
This is unlike the conventional politicians. As well as this, when the leaders of the pressure groups are elected the turnouts are usually very low. Due to the leaders not being elected, this therefore means that they are unaccountable and the influence in which they exert in many ways is not democratically legitimate. This problem is made worse by the growing number of pressure groups being led by a small number of senior professionals. In some cases, the pressure groups even undermine their internal democracy as the minority (the leaders) voices are heard rather than the majority (the members).
All of his evidence really points to the Indians being good warriors but not getting the appreciation they deserve after the war is over. He does not give much evidence that is against his thesis, everything seems to point back to his thesis. He is very opinionated with the support that he gives for his thesis. Robert S. Allen really uses his evidence very well to support his thesis. He is always giving more evidence stating that the Indians were not being taken care of unless the British needed them for war.
So much that his picture is on $1 bill. One example of is his one of his quotes “Be courteous to all, but intimate with few, and let those few be well tried before he give them her confidence.” This quote usually made people be ambitious. And another example is him not giving up during the war and kept on fighting till the end. Most people would not be like him and would not have the courage to stay and fight. Also there are millions of people in the world who look up to him not only because of him being a great help in the war but the courage that he had while fighting.
These quotes is relevant to me that in every fault or failure I make I don’t have to be defensive about it but accept these mistakes and to use them as stepping stone to improve myself and change for the better. “Well done is better than well said.” and “Speak little, do much.” [The meaning of these words is fairly easy to understand, but they serve as an excellent reminder to us. The things that we DO for others are so much more important than the things we SAY to others. In other words: “Actions Speak Louder Than Words.” So simple… but so very important to the relationships we are trying to build every day. These quotations are very relevant to me, especially because I am a very expressive or kind of a talkative person.
Hence, the women who Hebson interviewed were more likely to give answers that were more in depth and valid. However, Hebson's research method can be criticised by positivists for being unscientific as they argue that unstructured interviews lack a number of characteristics which they see as essential in scientific research, such as reliability and objectivity. Hebson's unstructured interviews may lack reliability as each woman that she interviewed is different and it depends on the unique relationship established between the interviewer and interviewee. Her research cannot be replicated by another sociologist. Hebson's research methods may lack objectivity as she had a personal relationship with the interviewees.
TERM LIMITS FOR CONGRESS I believe that term limits should be placed on our Congressmen and women because it would allow for a more efficient Congress. The current Congress is in shambles, a dismal failure and is in desperate need of new ideas, procedures, and influence. With term limits in place, Congress will be more responsible toward their constituents because they themselves will soon be constituents. They will have to live under and abide by the laws they created while in office. They’ll have less time in office to develop money ties to lobbyists and other special interest groups, thereby weakening the threat of lobbyists being able to influence legislation.
When the interviewer says that the word is hurtful Bradley replies by saying, “the word is not hurtful but how it is used and the person who is saying it is hurtful”. I agree with Bradley, I feel that although the word is used too often now a days, the word itself is not hurtful, but how the word is used is what really makes other people feel hurt and uncomfortable. Overall I think that we all agreed that the word nigger has become a word that is too commonly used during present time. The word in my opinion is now used more