Battle Of Marathon Essay

1520 Words7 Pages
Leadership and Strategy in the Battle of Marathon Leadership and strategy played a vital role in the final outcome of the Greco-Persian wars from the battle of Marathon in 490bc to the battle of Mycale in 479bc. The Greeks used their determination, sacrifice and knowledge of local terrains to beat the larger Persian forces. Generals such as Miltiades, Themistocles and Leonidas of the Greeks and Mardonius and Xerxes of the Persian all played their own important roles. The battle of Marathon in was a watershed in the Greco-Persian wars. Its final outcome went down to the superior battle strategy of Miltiades and also went down to a bit of luck. It was the first Greek victory against the Persians and filled the Greek states with confidence that they could repel any Persian attacks. The battle occurred on the 12th September 490bc and the Persians were led by Datis and Artephernes while according to Herodotus the Greeks were led by a representatives of each of the 10…show more content…
The Athenian General Themistocles should be credited for the outcome as he knew the Greeks should stand and fight in Salamis and not fall back further to Isthmus like others wanted. So to get the battle to go ahead Themistocles sent a messenger to Xerxes saying that his men will aid the Persians if they fight as other Greeks planned on retreat, Xerxes responded to this sending his large Triremes to block all exits at Salamis a task which took them all night to do without rest. With nowhere for the Greeks to go they fought the drained Persian navy and their home advantage again played a role in superior strategy, the smaller Greek triremes easily cut through Xerxes fleet with their underwater rams. Herodotus writes that half the Persian fleet were destroyed and the rest retreated as the Greeks followed them looking for more destruction. -“The Persians were in confusion and had no
Open Document