A. Current price transaction looks like an arms-length bargain but one party's promise appears illusory, courts often will look to the context of the agreement and identify an implied non-illusory promise such that the consideration requirement is satisfied. 1. Letter to Little Buyer offer? rejection by entering into a substitute transaction, he is excused from performance obligations B.
Scarcity is limitedness, which leads to choice making whereby one good or service is chosen which leads to opportunity cost. The alternative foregone is opportunity cost. Opportunity cost is whet you forego or give up one thing that you want to get something else that you believe you want even more. What role do they play in the making of managerial decisions? Scarcity cost: In making managerial decisions, we must first consider that our resources are limited.
Legally, this could save the company bad publicity, a great amount of stress, and money that isn’t necessary to spend. Setting up mediation to come to an agreement outside of court is best for the company. If that means paying unemployment benefits to someone who has left the company at their own will, then so be it, going to court is risky, time consuming, and can become
Joe could lose his job and even worse he could put the company in place for a lawsuit. The ethical theory that supports how I think Joe should respond to this invitation is the utilitarianism theory. This approach states that a decision that maximizes the ratio of good over evil for all those concerned is the ethical course, (McAdams, Neslund, & Neslund, 2007). The utilitarianism theory should be used because Joe should think which action he should take that would benefit the most involved. If he goes on the trip it is only good for Bill.
I would have some difficulty ordering the parts possibly which could delay the repair but it would eventually get fixed and possibly much cheaper than calling a repair man. Conclusion: Using the creative process enabled me to isolate the problem and develop two possible solutions. After discussing the solutions with my wife we agreed that calling a repair man was the best decision because time is more important than the possibility of saving a few dollars. By using the creative process I have opened my mind to numerous ideas and developed two viable solutions. If I did not used the creative process, I may have overlooked the obvious problem and just replaced the refridgerator which would cost me lots of money.
If there is zero chance of the outcome swaying in your direction then at some points you might as well give up. Living with this philosophy will get you nowhere though, because if you always give up early then you may not know how it could have ended. For example if you simply will not win a court case because there is hard evidence of the defendant being guilty, then it might be acceptable for you to call it quits. This could make sense because, if you could spend your time doing something more productive with your time instead of wasting it on a lost cause. You never know how something will end; you must always wait it out till the end.
The illustration of how unattractive this new financial situation would be hard to measure and speculation of losing their financial standing would move the Opera against the merger. To solidify the lack of desirability of the merger, Mr. Bailey could use the opinions of outside skeptics that have spoken against Mrs. Ewer. These skeptics believe that Ewer would not be up to the task and the economic gains that are anticipated would not happen. These skeptics believe that the differences in the Opera and the Symphony would not make a good business model. A2.
Likewise it is not fair for a person that is innocent and is pressured to plea bargain for the believe that he or she will most likely not be considered not guilty. This will still affect them in the future will jobs and society. Works
It may be that you do not challenge discrimination often, that you do not feel that can challenge discrimination or that you do not recognise discrimination when it occurs around you. It might also be that you are afraid to challenge discrimination for some reason, or that you do not believe there is value in equal opportunities. Whatever the case, it is time you realise that discrimination against anyone hurts everyone. Until every person is guaranteed equality, no one is. Think on this the next time you observe discrimination taking place and ask yourself if you really want to sit back and let it happen.
First, he explains that we will experience emotional pain when we recognize that the work we would love to do might just be unavailable enough to make us doubt that we can proceed. Maisel states, “This is an emotional suffering that researchers haven’t examined: the pain of wanting to do certain intellectual work but not being capable of it.” He then goes on to discuss ways to help your brain to be its best. This can range from silencing the self-talk that can rob you of your confidence, to making fewer excuses about why you don’t have the time, patience, or ability to think. Secondly he points out that choosing the intellectual work that matches your native intelligence, or in other words, staying in your comfort zone. He tells us to find an area of work that isn’t too difficult which enables you to do work that makes use of all your strengths.