Bartok's Concerto For Orchestra

5352 Words22 Pages
Traditional and Innovative Aspects of Bartók’s Concerto for Orchestra Movement 1 Bartók had several precursors in composers who also had written works entitled Concerto for Orchestra [Hindemith (Frankfurt 1925), Petrassi (Rome 1933-34), and his colleague Kodály (Chicago 1941)], so that while it was decidedly a twentieth century species, his was not the very first to emerge; while still ‘modern’, there was more than a brief bit of history behind it, as I hope to show. Straightaway let me note that in terms of instrumentation, the scoring would argue a Romantic symphony: the ‘serious’ brass in the forms of trombones and tuba as well as the regular trumpets, together with the triple sets of woodwind, provide the kind of orchestral punch associated with some late nineteenth century compositions, for example, by Wagner; however, this impression is immediately dispelled once the orchestra strikes up: if we have to use a label, it might be termed Neo-classical. In keeping with the traditional symphony, it is a large, powerful opus, with the traditionally-structured five movements, although with Bartók’s individual stamp. Additionally, as the composer himself notes, ‘the first and fifth movements are written in a more or less regular sonata form,’ immediately showing a major Classical influence. One innovative aspect, commented on by Bartók in his programme note for the first performance, was the way he saw the whole orchestra as generating a constantly changing concertino drawn from the various orchestral sections, so that while the brass, for instance, may have the spotlight for a period, there is no individual virtuosic part, and the rest of the orchestra plays the ripieno part; thus, it is novel, yet reaches back in time to the concerto grosso of Baroque times, as do the canon and fugato sections of the development which I will look at later. A

More about Bartok's Concerto For Orchestra

Open Document