Barrington Moore vs. Ted Gurr

941 Words4 Pages
Christina Gill 9/17/14 PSCI 3062 Word Count: 930 Barrington Moore vs. Ted Gurr Thought Paper Relative deprivation is the term that an individual or a group of people experiences when they believe they deserve more than they have. It is only human nature to compare oneself to another individual regarding what you have and what you should have based on what the other has. It is difficult to simply ignore the possibility (if there is one) of having the potential to possess what you truly deserve. The feeling of knowing that you are worse off than most people can lead to frustration. On top of that, the tension that grows after discovering that one could have a higher standard of living than what they currently have, sometimes results in an act of rebellion or even violence. The more intense the feeling of deprivation, the more intense the act of violence. However, relative deprivation is only a perception. For example, one perspective may view an individual as working class, while the individual themselves may think they are living in extreme poverty. Perhaps a huge catalyst that allowed Barrington Moore’s classical model to progress was relative deprivation. Through the notion of relative deprivation, the economy, society, and intellectuals progressed according to Moore’s classical historical model. Gurr and Moore’s theories are similar in that they both have to do with economic interests, but are different due to the fact that Moore’s theory is more complex. I definitely believe relative deprivation motivated social change. I think it also is a huge reason why people join political and social movements in the first place. People must take action for something in order to obtain it. In order to acquire gay marriage, people join the LGBT protests. The Civil Rights movement helped lessen the amount of RD African Americans were experiencing in the U.S. Sit-ins

More about Barrington Moore vs. Ted Gurr

Open Document