This scenario has you thinking really hard should I give up my money or should I say no I don’t have it. Then you think if you give up your money what will they use it for? Will they use it for a helpful reason like food? Or would they use it for an addiction? Then your debate goes even further, do you have the right to judge someone because they are homeless?
We can solve these problem by providing those homeless people with a small with a small room as the government can’t afford to build big house just to save those homeless people . Besides that , the government can offer
They also live for the moment (present gratification). Some sociologists say that these attitudes and values prevent people from escaping poverty. For example, the attitudes and values of the poor mean that many don't stay in education, so they can't use qualifications to escape from their poverty. Some sociologists criticise this explanation of poverty because although it shows how people in poverty might adapt to their situation, it doesn't explain why people are in poverty in the first place. Another explanation of poverty is the poverty cycle.
Even though financial assistance is supposed to be a means of temporary aid, many aren't looking at it that way Many people are taking advantage of the fact that they can get it and not on the fact of if they need it or not. A lot of people that are living in poverty rely on federal assistance in order to ensure their survival. Once they get on assistance many of them find it very difficult to get off of it. Even though this may not be the case for all of those on assistance, the whole group is being classified with the same stigma. With so many people being on federal assistance it has created a lot of stress on our economic system and the tax payers that support it it has created a negative situation because so many see the system being abused and they feel they aren't benefiting
Company Q in the scenario provided has a very poor attitude towards social responsibility because though they provide some basic aspects like Economic and Legal they fall short in Ethical and Philanthropic aspects. We will examine ways that Company Q can improve those lacking aspects. The first potential improvement is in the store closing situation of the scenario where Company Q closed two stores in high crime rate areas. Company Q has the right to be profitable and if they report that these stores are losing money then they have every right to close those stores but they made no efforts in the Philanthropic aspect of social responsibility. Company Q could have made investments in the local community that would have potentially improved the community thus decreasing the crime rate.
Some of the residents I’ve cared for, may have had a disability, but they were very manipulative. You have to keep in mind that you are not there to be a friend, but to assist them with daily living. I feel like the company did not properly train the employees, but at the same time, it’s common sense, and very easy to pick up on. One resident for instance, had an issue with spending money. She also had a nicotine addiction.
Some communities are so torn that legal economic opportunities to support families are nearly nonexistent. Minorities are often expected to do better for themselves, but some think that it is easier for themselves to go out and steal rather then getting a job. Through Shakur’s lyrics he is making a statement that this is not the way to live life. Minorities must rise above the obstacles and out of the vicious cycle of poverty that wreaks havoc on many urban communities. Shakur expresses ways to accomplish peace in society, through his lyrics.
The most extreme example of this is the “bystander effect,” where individuals fail to help in an emergency situation. There is a tendency to think that if we look the other way when someone addresses us on the street, we won’t feel nearly so bad about not giving away our food or money. Or to portray homeless victims negatively, if I give them money they might use it to buy drugs or if I try and help them they might take advantage of me, relativism; a theory that knowledge is relative to the limited nature of the mind and the conditions of knowing. I believe that unless one has experienced this personally or know someone who has gone through the situation then they will not be able to relate or want to help or stop the cause. Society view homeless people as despised or disdained, labeled as lazy and insignificant.
Introspective Paper Growing up in Brooklyn, NY most believe that you are born at a disadvantage, I believe I am blessed. The people in the community aren’t really on your side and, to people outside of my community give us and label. Some are considered lucky to make it out and the others that don’t are considered to be thugs, gangster, and criminals. My community isn’t the best but it is the start of my legacy and the reason for my motivation to help others in similar situations. Helping people is something I just feel like I have to do and that it is selfish of me not to help a person in need.
Others will enter into the relationship with debts but are ashamed to mention it. Becoming a joined pair, they are confronted with a new set of financial decisions that might add unnecessary stress to an otherwise healthy companionship. Money is a polarizing factor in relationships, but through communication and financial literacy, the separation can be prevented. Because of lack of knowledge on financial literacy or planning, couples often disagree with each other. Learning the importance of money should start as a young child, but often the opposite is taught.