Audit Committee Case Study

1473 Words6 Pages
Audit committee chairmanship Agency theory focuses on the conflicting interests between the principals and agents. This theory received the attention of many researchers(Jensen & Meckling, 1976; Fama & Jensen, 1983; and Bonazzi and Islam,2006 ). It is expected from an accountable board of directors to protect the investor interest and portray both independence and transparency. Contributing in corporate governance malpractice is always alerting and subject to continuous inspection. In the light of this dilemma, some studies focused on the composition and chairmanship of audit committees. Findings showed that financial institutions with independent directors in their audit committee have higher performance during the 2007-2008 financial crises(…show more content…
Others argued that audit committees with independent chairs contribute to more effective control systems as long as the management is not involved the selection of the directors (Carello etal.,2011). Abiding with the composition and structure requirements of an audit committee grantees performing its "oversight responsibilities" (Ferreira 2008). This necessarily requires total independence from the executive board members. The appointment of inside directors in an audit committee leads to a lower level of independence in an audit committee (Sharma etal.,2009). To enhance high-quality corporate governance and ensure transparent business environments, several regulatory codes have established on corporate governance. They all address the composition of audit committees. UK Corporate Governance Code and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires the establishment an audit committee in public companies consisting of independent non-executive directors and at least one financial…show more content…
The presence of independent directors in an audit committee ensures compliance with the standards and statutory requirements and accordingly the issuance of unqualified audit report (Carcello and Neal, 2000). The independence of an audit committee is expected to be reasonably compromised if the audit committee is not solely composed of independent directors (Bronson etal., 2009). Using this reasoning the quality, competence and independence of an audit committee is reinforced by non affiliated directors who will monitor the financial reporting process (Choi etal., 2004) and reduce information asymmetry (Beasly and Salterio 2001). However, an audit committee which is fully comprised of independent directors improves earning informativeness and accordingly (Woidtke

More about Audit Committee Case Study

Open Document