Therefore, the presence of an individual produces positive reinforcement as they have a more attractive appeal. This theory also suggests that we are attracted to people if we meet them whilst we’re in a good mood, an example being at a party. As a result, previously neutral stimuli become positively valued as they are associated with the pleasant event, therefore meaning that we learn to like people through classical conditioning. Griffit and Guay (1969) conducted a study to investigate how the reward/need satisfaction theory works and how well it is acceptable. Participants were evaluated on a creative task by an experimenter.
However participants who are interviewed are those with a lot of time on their hands this can make the sample unrepresentative of the whole population as they may be lonely people who have a lot of time on their hands. When conducting questionnaires participants may find it difficult to understand what a question is asking them, however with a structured interview the interviewer is able to explain and clarify the questions in order to gain a valid response. However as the interviewer has to follow a set of instructions they can’t give more detail to the respondent if they say something particularly interesting. Structured interviews have many advantages
The reward/need satisfaction theory of relationship proposed by Byrne & Clore (1970) asserts that if a relationship is seen to offer the prospect of reward (for either party), it is more likely to form – if there is little or no perceived reward, the relationship does not form. Their model is based on the behaviourist principles of operant and classical conditioning. According to the former, behaviour that results in a beneficial outcome makes repetition of this behaviour more likely, whereas if the outcome is undesirable, the behaviour is less likely to be repeated or continued. A relationship that brings perceived advantages is a case of positive reinforcement but the relationship can also be characterised by negative reinforcement if the
The other main theme throughout the story was that you should always pick the right people to be friends with. Because you don’t always know what’s in store for them. They could be a totally different person behind your back but then when their with you, they are a whole entire different person. It’s hard to decide who is the right people for you. You don’t always know what to look for, or who to look for.
However, there are many different elements that need to be considered if a couple is to communicate successfully. Couples today need to understand the components that are needed to communicate effectively in their relationship. One article noted many couples commonly believe “they communicate better than they actually do” (Close Relationships, 2011); but many are not communicating effectively. Having an understanding that our own self-concept, perceptions, emotions, and nonverbal expression, gender and culture, listening skills, and the level of self-disclosure they are willing to divulge have an effect on their satisfaction within the relationship. While it is easy to overlook these elements, they certainly shape how all individuals communicate in all types of relationships.
There are other parameters, which are important, but Trust is one of the most important, of all. Mark (2) and Linda (3) have both scored a little less on the “Do I Trust Others?” assessment test. This is a challenge for me to instill the confidence in them, that people are trustworthy. This might be because of their past experiences with people, which made them think like this. But I will support and help them to regain that Trust.
Many in society would view being consistent as a very good trait and something that everyone should do. When someone is always changing their mind it is usually looked down upon in society. People who are firm in their beliefs and don’t change their mind are looked as great people and are great for sticking what they believe in. If a public figure had a strong viewpoint on something, but changed their viewpoint they would receive great criticism and lose lots of fans. Emerson’s view on consistency is, once again, completely different form the average view from society.
People typically demand respect before giving it. This is an all to common misconception. If we all demanded respect, before giving it, no one would be respected in the first place. Respect can make or break relationships in the work place. Other example in this area include: your behavior and manners, your eating habits and exercising routine, your attitude and thoughts, and the way you respond to challenges.
What does this do to the trust that has been built between leaders and followers? Many times what separates leaders from the rest is the fact that they are viewed as competent, trustworthy, and dependable. When someone fails in such crucial areas are marital commitments, financial responsibilities, and sins of other natures, it is viewed as a weakness. Even when they admit fault and responsibility for what they have done, the damage is done. It takes much time and much effort to regain the trust that was once
The weaknesses could be their belief in free will is in opposition to the deterministic laws of science or the issues they investigate, such as consciousness and emotion, are amongst the most difficult to objectively study. In counselling I believe there is a higher chance to address individual’s needs as client centered therapy works on a one to one basis. This specifically enables the individual services users’ needs to be met. To enable client centered therapy I believe a good counsellor is needed without a judgmental approach. Also the service provider is needed to have empathy and know how to sympathise with the client.