But Zarrof did do his share of the game and Rainsford didn’t ambush because he didn’t want to make a huge commotion and did not want to kill them 4. A. he thought it was nonsense and thought that’s impossible but that did not effect him at the time B. that Ivan possibly could have changed the out come of the story line and if played right might can killed Rainsford and hunting or hunted traps could work any way C. he is extremely happy he is out of there 5. I
Some people, rather than listening to what the law says should be done, listen to what their conscience suggests is right or wrong. In To Kill a Mockingbird there are two main people who act as moral compasses in the town of Maycomb, and one person who is definitely the opposite of a moral compass. Atticus and Jean Louise Finch were both excellent examples of moral compasses, because they both showed people the right thing to do, whereas Mayella Ewell did the wrong thing and was not showing the honourable thing to do. Only some people can be a moral compass for others and it takes a great deal of courage to become one. Atticus Finch not only took the case of a black man, but went against everyone’s beliefs that black people were lower, and actually tried to defend Tom Robinson from a crime that he was wrongfully accused of doing.
Although Frank is a respected war hero who saved many lives and also idolized by David but when he treats the young Indian women, he molest and rapes them. He shows no sign of pity for them and will kill them after molesting or raping. Julian Hayden is a man who loves gaining control of others. He assumes that he’s above the law so ‘they couldn’t arrest us’. When Julian slowly found out about Frank’s crimes, he thinks that Frank should not be arrested because he is the war hero.
Scout learns a major lesson which is not to kill a Mockingbird. She learns that Boo is simply an innocent mockingbird and does not harm just sings and Boo just suffered from his fathers cruel intentions which made the town see him as a harmful creature. The children and Boo never had a physical connection or chemistry but this barrier is soon broken when he saves the children form Bob Ewell. Scout now understands and see’s Boo as actually a real creature although she still points at him, which shows her transformation is still in progress she treats Boo like a real person. When Atticus fails to understand that Boo was the one who killed Bob, Scout explains Atticus a lesson which is usually visa versa, that you must never kill a Mockingbird and by exposing and giving him the negative publicity towards Boo it would be like killing him in a way.
36. Atticus doesn’t want Jem to be protected by lies because Atticus is a noble and truthful man and wants the best of everyone, even if that meant Jem being accused and found guilty of the crime, but later it was found that Boo did it. It was Boo who killed Bob as he loved the children and cared about them about and saw the issues in the community and how much it affected them, Sherrif wanted to protect Boo as it is a sin to kill a mockingbird.
Another example of morality occurs when Atticus reveals he would rather do right by him, then to keep others happy. Atticus states, “ before I can live with other folks I've got to live with myself. The one thing that doesn't abide by majority rule is a person's conscience.” (114) Atticus demonstrates an understanding of right and wrong and a self conscience to do what is right no matter the consequence. One more example of morality is when Scout sees Boo for the first time. Scout states, “Boo was our neighbor.
In Huckleberry Finn, Mark Twain shows Huck as someone who pushes away harmful people but also brings closer those he sees as being good. Huck joins in the drama of Jim’s life because he cares about Jim not being “sold down the river”(11). We can also see that Huck does everything possible to stay out of harm way while dealing with Jim’s well being. This is easily seen when looking at his relationship with Jim versus his relationship with the King and Duke, and the comparison he makes between them and pap. Huck’s relationship with the king and duke begins as an adventure, “the first thing that come out was that these chaps didn’t know one another” (154); Twain, when explaining how they ended up on the canoe with Huck, never truly tells whether or not they knew each other before meeting Huck.
His character is hungry for an idealistic type of justice because he is young and free from indiscretion and therefore naive, which leads him to believe that living life without giving in to worldly desires is a task that people are actually capable of. In contrast, Duke Vincentio has lived and experienced enough to know that no man can carry out an existence free from transgressions. He believes that you should judge people in the same way that you would judge yourself. As law-enforcers, the Duke and Angelo do not differ completely in their feelings about the law. The Duke is concerned that the laws have become useless, likening them to a rod, which becomes mocked when it’s used long enough to scare rather than to punish.
Names like Le Spewer, Fishtail Le Sewer and Manure. He thought by turning the other cheek this would not give Barry Baglsey any opportunity to pick on him. What it did was show Barry Bagsley that hel was too afraid to stand up to him which meant that Barry Bagsley continued to pick on him and call him names all the time. If Ishmael had felt good about his name then he wouldn’t have needed to turn the other cheek he could have shown the bullies that he was proud of his name. Being proud of his name would have made him feel good and shown the bullies that what they said didn’t worry him.
There is a middle ground between fear and love with a ruler because you should not have a ruler who you do not love and agree with because then there is no point into listening to him but you should not also have a ruler who you do not fear because then if just one person disagrees with him, they will take advantage of the fact that the leader is not someone intimidating and get rid of him. Leaders should have a little bit of both traits. Fear is safer than love because you never have to worry about getting killed by a traitor or anyone ever opposing you publicly. With your people being terrified of you, you will never have to go through what President JFK went through, assassination. You will not have to ever go through opposition like Mao because will be so terrified that if you oppose them, you would kill them like Mao did.